ChatterBank10 mins ago
How Do You Factor A 2 Variable Trinomial?
28 Answers
I hate factoring man, specifically these questions (^2=to the power of 2)
w^2 - 3wz - 10z^2
x^4 + 12x^2 + 20
If anybody could help me understand what to do that would be amazing
w^2 - 3wz - 10z^2
x^4 + 12x^2 + 20
If anybody could help me understand what to do that would be amazing
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Niko. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Just reminded of the genius Andrew Wiles, of Fermat fame, who began his post graduate studies with elliptical curves, which, I understand, are neither elliptical nor curved!
Mysterious!
And he's only two years younger than me!
(And he might have sneaked into Answerbank, wearing a camouflage jacket).
Mysterious!
And he's only two years younger than me!
(And he might have sneaked into Answerbank, wearing a camouflage jacket).
there are some really good maff series on you tube
( all will be revealed) - MIT have quite comprehensive courses
( where you learn interesting things like factors were land agents on arable farms in the C19 - but ho hum this is AB)
over lock down I did 65 h of computability - very very accessible. ( and virtually nothing on intermediate NT Greek.
( all will be revealed) - MIT have quite comprehensive courses
( where you learn interesting things like factors were land agents on arable farms in the C19 - but ho hum this is AB)
over lock down I did 65 h of computability - very very accessible. ( and virtually nothing on intermediate NT Greek.
Andrew Wiles by 16 was conversant with all bad proofs of Fermats Theorem up to 1900.
and had a few goes at Fermat via elliptical curves - and the one wivda photo and Wiles has just said - - "and if this is true then the following theorem ( writes down Fermat) is not true for all values above two...."
and the audience start screaming ...... he's made a mistake.
and had a few goes at Fermat via elliptical curves - and the one wivda photo and Wiles has just said - - "and if this is true then the following theorem ( writes down Fermat) is not true for all values above two...."
and the audience start screaming ...... he's made a mistake.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.