just watching "The Frogs Legacy" for the Nth time so I more or less know every line. So at the wedding, Boycie has a go at the Trotters' present.....
Boycie: "He probably gave them that old crockery he bought at the Chinese auction"
Del: "How dare you..."
Boycie: "Well I wouldn't put it past you.."
*1 Rodney: "It that true? did our dinner service come from the Chinese takeaway?"
Del: "No I swear..."
Rodney: "...well those plates had an awful lot of Pandas and pagodas on them..."
Del: "..OK they did ...etc
Anyway Rodney's line marked *1 was cut, why? How is that in anyway offensive and even if it was why is comedy being butchered like this?
I often think of repeats as giving someone their first viewing, so I get TTT's pov. For those of us who have seen the programmes from the very off it can feel a bit like being cheated and enforces the dreaded "woke" word.
barry, "There are a lot of cuts in these repeats to squish the adverts in. There were no advert breaks in the original series " - yes but chopping the guts out of a vital scene just kills the scene. Plenty of other places for cuts. This is TROB butchery, can they not accept that these programs are "of there time" - in fact I have seen some warnings to that effect on other programs.
I often think of repeats as giving someone their first viewing, so I get TTT's pov. For those of us who have seen the programmes from the very off it can feel a bit like being cheated and enforces the dreaded "woke" word.
it can also ruin the pay off in John Sullivan shows. He has a tendency to build a main joke through the episode and chopping it about can ruin that. So I feel new watchers may have a different opinion of a show because they are not seeing it as the writer intended.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.