Quizzes & Puzzles88 mins ago
MATHS - HEIGHT OF A TRIANGLE! URGENT!!!!
19 Answers
Ok, i need this in for tomorrow.
I have a right angled triange, and I am asked to find the height (using my answer to part a. of the question which asked for the area).
The area is 149.7m squared..
The hypotenuse of the triangle (opposite the right angle) is 15m.
That's all the information i have and i need to work out the height of this!!
HELP ME.
hhaa, thanks.
I have a right angled triange, and I am asked to find the height (using my answer to part a. of the question which asked for the area).
The area is 149.7m squared..
The hypotenuse of the triangle (opposite the right angle) is 15m.
That's all the information i have and i need to work out the height of this!!
HELP ME.
hhaa, thanks.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by _sophie_. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i was waiting for that one haha!
basically there is a triangle, base is 25m, other two sides are 20m and 15m. i used the cosine rule to work out the area (god help me if that's wrong too, which it probably is).
and the second part of the question asks me to find the height another triangle. this 'other triangle' is only part of the original triangle, and so i do not have a value for the base of my new triangle.
probably makes no sense but if you could see the piece of paper i have infront of me you would get it!!!! hahaha.
basically there is a triangle, base is 25m, other two sides are 20m and 15m. i used the cosine rule to work out the area (god help me if that's wrong too, which it probably is).
and the second part of the question asks me to find the height another triangle. this 'other triangle' is only part of the original triangle, and so i do not have a value for the base of my new triangle.
probably makes no sense but if you could see the piece of paper i have infront of me you would get it!!!! hahaha.
Confusion reigns.
This first triangle has sides 15, 20 and 25. The area of that is 150 square metres.
You've now got another right-angled triangle of hypotenuse 15m - the first one was 25m.
The 2nd ones height is in a straight ratio of the first - the ratio being 15/25 or 0.6.
If the height of your first one was 15, the height of your second one is 15*0.6 or 9
But if height first one was 20, the 2nd one's height is 20*0.6 or 12m.
I still don't know which way up it is.
This first triangle has sides 15, 20 and 25. The area of that is 150 square metres.
You've now got another right-angled triangle of hypotenuse 15m - the first one was 25m.
The 2nd ones height is in a straight ratio of the first - the ratio being 15/25 or 0.6.
If the height of your first one was 15, the height of your second one is 15*0.6 or 9
But if height first one was 20, the 2nd one's height is 20*0.6 or 12m.
I still don't know which way up it is.
There is no solution to this if the area is 149.7 m². If the hypotenuse is 15m then the base and height much both be less than 15m. One combination using Pythagoras is a base of 9 and a height of 12. But given that area = half base x height then there is no possible solution that gives an area anywhere near as big as 149.7. For example a 9, 12, 15 triangle has an area of only 54.
-- answer removed --
Precisely my confusion, F30.
The first right-angled triangle had sides of 25. 20 and 15. That has an area of 150, which Sophie had calculated as 149.7, presumably because of rounding error in the cosine table she used (it didn't actually need cosines to works that out).
We then discover the existence of a second triangle that has a hypotenuse of 15 and are asked to work out the height. Hence my last answer - it's surely a simple ratio job.
I suspect this has long-since past its 'best before' date.
The first right-angled triangle had sides of 25. 20 and 15. That has an area of 150, which Sophie had calculated as 149.7, presumably because of rounding error in the cosine table she used (it didn't actually need cosines to works that out).
We then discover the existence of a second triangle that has a hypotenuse of 15 and are asked to work out the height. Hence my last answer - it's surely a simple ratio job.
I suspect this has long-since past its 'best before' date.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.