Why is it always assumed that its the husband ? i find this really disappointing.
I am a father and i am in the same boat, my wife of 6 months was found with another man she moved out and took the kids? why should it be automatic that this is the case ? a 50/50 split is only right.
She has tried the CSA and now wants to move back in ? she has not paid a penny to joint debts, or the mortgage or helped. She has a rented house and hardly works, she wont me have the children more.
But i went to court and now it has been stated that she must pay 50/50 of the debts, the house is mine for me and the children as she left it and now i'm getting a split on the children's benefits, i will always provide for my children. On the house my Ex now has to pay half the mortgage while im there with the boys.
I would change the locks and get a court order to prevent him coming back if that is what is right for you, but 1st ask yourself why fif you have children with this man ? why are you trying to stop him ? on i would not say that as some one posted that he's a clever man for paying the mortgage i would say hes a kind man, children are JOINT responsibilities and every one should pay a fair cost, and if you work you should be able to do what you want with your disposable income ! how is this guy ment to start again when hes paying a mortgage.
Why did you split ?
there two sides to every story.
Im sorry but its not actually about you its the children and every father has a right.