Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
I have a 2nd charge on a property and the present owner has gone bankrupty
3 Answers
Could any please advise, We were ment to have a charge placed on a property, 10 years ago, but apparently the solicitor forgot to do this at the time, we have proof that he was meant to do this and beleived until recently that this had been done. The ex then increased the mortgate and we are now also being told by the socilitor that the 10% charge is only on the Net Profit not the price the house was sold for and that we would only get 10% after the bankruptcy costs are paid and of course the mortgate which I understand is the first charge. Is this true, or as they made such a mess 10 years ago, are they trying to get out of paying us any money. Any advice would be helpful. Thank you.
Answers
It's not clear from your query whether you do in fact have a charge at all. However, whether you do or don't what happens now the owner is bankrupt depends on a number of factors. It can become quite complex. If you have a charge you need to decide whether you are going to rely on the security of the charge or abandon it & prove your debt in the bankruptcy. If you don't...
20:06 Tue 01st Mar 2011
It's not clear from your query whether you do in fact have a charge at all. However, whether you do or don't what happens now the owner is bankrupt depends on a number of factors. It can become quite complex. If you have a charge you need to decide whether you are going to rely on the security of the charge or abandon it & prove your debt in the bankruptcy. If you don't have a charge you have to prove your debt in the bankruptcy.
It would be a good idea for you to talk to the Official Receiver dealing with the case. The solicitor will quite likely not be involved in deciding how much (if any) money you get. I think the situation is possibly that if you rely on your security (assuming you have a charge) & are able to get an order for sale - or the mortgage lender gets one - then you will be paid after the mortgage lender is satisfied before the bankruptcy estate becomes involved. I'm not sure about this - you need to get it checked.
If you do not have a charge then you rank just the same as other non-secured creditors. If that is the position & you lose out as a result you might be able to make a complaint against the solicitors for their negligence.
It would be a good idea for you to talk to the Official Receiver dealing with the case. The solicitor will quite likely not be involved in deciding how much (if any) money you get. I think the situation is possibly that if you rely on your security (assuming you have a charge) & are able to get an order for sale - or the mortgage lender gets one - then you will be paid after the mortgage lender is satisfied before the bankruptcy estate becomes involved. I'm not sure about this - you need to get it checked.
If you do not have a charge then you rank just the same as other non-secured creditors. If that is the position & you lose out as a result you might be able to make a complaint against the solicitors for their negligence.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.