Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Fraud By False Representation
i went to court on friday for fraud by false representation for a tota;ll of 1100 i had use duty solctor as i am working now he was ok i had a probation report probation are saying suspended sentence tag and comunity service i am back in court in 2 weekss i am willing pay all money back i have prevbious in 2011 otall 500 and 2009 for breach of my job im so worried i just dunno wa to do please help i have a family to surport i did it becose of my gamblinga ddiction whch i am on tracking sorting now with gamblers annon and banning from book makers thanks again
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by cassar26. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Law/ Questio n127348 1.html
What are you not understanding, you seem to be repeating the question?
What are you not understanding, you seem to be repeating the question?
Cassar, mitigation as follows:-
Four personal mitigating factors that are relevant to this type of offending:
Voluntary cessation of offending, especially where accompanied by a genuine expression of remorse.
This may depend upon the time that has elapsed since the commission of the last offence and the reasons why an offender stopped offending. Where it was because of a heightened fear of discovery or the fact that the additional funds were no longer needed, a court may conclude that the degree of mitigation is negligible or that this factor should not be taken into account at all.
Complete and unprompted disclosure of the extent of the fraud. This amounts to ready co-operation with the authorities, which the Council has recognised as offender mitigation. The point at which the disclosure is made and the degree of assistance given to the authorities, should determine the amount of mitigation.
Voluntary restitution. The point at which an offender voluntarily returns property or money obtained through fraud will be important and, the earlier it is returned the greater the degree of mitigation the offender should receive.
Financial pressure. Whilst many are motivated by greed or a desire to live beyond legitimate means, others may be motivated by financial pressure. In principle, financial pressure is a factor that neither increases nor diminishes an offenders culpability in relation to any type of dishonesty offence, including fraud. However, where financial pressure is exceptional and not of the offender's own making, it may in very rare circumstances constitute offender mitigation.
Four personal mitigating factors that are relevant to this type of offending:
Voluntary cessation of offending, especially where accompanied by a genuine expression of remorse.
This may depend upon the time that has elapsed since the commission of the last offence and the reasons why an offender stopped offending. Where it was because of a heightened fear of discovery or the fact that the additional funds were no longer needed, a court may conclude that the degree of mitigation is negligible or that this factor should not be taken into account at all.
Complete and unprompted disclosure of the extent of the fraud. This amounts to ready co-operation with the authorities, which the Council has recognised as offender mitigation. The point at which the disclosure is made and the degree of assistance given to the authorities, should determine the amount of mitigation.
Voluntary restitution. The point at which an offender voluntarily returns property or money obtained through fraud will be important and, the earlier it is returned the greater the degree of mitigation the offender should receive.
Financial pressure. Whilst many are motivated by greed or a desire to live beyond legitimate means, others may be motivated by financial pressure. In principle, financial pressure is a factor that neither increases nor diminishes an offenders culpability in relation to any type of dishonesty offence, including fraud. However, where financial pressure is exceptional and not of the offender's own making, it may in very rare circumstances constitute offender mitigation.