it seems to me that Answerbankers are either pro or anti police. Why do they find it difficult to look at each incident individually?
This particular copper was out of order, even if the man had spat (and there is no evidence that he did) was there any need to barge past the child to get at him?
It wasn't a life or death situation, why the hell did he draw his baton?
And the child was so traumatised that he wet his pants, shocking overreaction by the police.