ChatterBank22 mins ago
Two Murders - No Witnesses
This makes interesting reading. His first murder (no witnesses) was recorded as an accident, but the second one (no witnesses) raised doubts about the first.
Evidence gathered on the second was sufficient to convict him - evidence on the first now being re-visited casts doubts on that one also.
Could the first have been handled better - easy with hindsight of course.
Read it, and see what you think.
http:// www.mir ror.co. uk/news /real-l ife-sto ries/hu sband-p ushed-w ife-130 ft-clif f-73075 98?ref= yfp
Evidence gathered on the second was sufficient to convict him - evidence on the first now being re-visited casts doubts on that one also.
Could the first have been handled better - easy with hindsight of course.
Read it, and see what you think.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This case may be of some interest. It allowed similar facts to be adduced as evidence in court.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Georg e_Josep h_Smith
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.