Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Can A 16 Year Old Get Charged
can a 16 year old lad get charged for sleeping with a 15 year old girl and now shes pregnant and hes standing by her and he will pay for his child and her parents want to report it to the police what would happen
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by purekiki. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Statutory rape only applies if the child is under the age of 13. (S.5 Sexual Offences Act 2003)
"It is an offence for anyone to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 16. However, Home Office guidance [1] is clear that there is no intention to prosecute teenagers under the age of 16 where both mutually agree and where they are of a similar age"
http:// www.fpa .org.uk /factsh eets/la w-on-se x
"It is an offence for anyone to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 16. However, Home Office guidance [1] is clear that there is no intention to prosecute teenagers under the age of 16 where both mutually agree and where they are of a similar age"
http://
sounds like the lad would be well advised to stay clear from such controlling parents..as stated although technically an offence has taken place..unless the girl makes a complaint it is unlikely that much would happen..so make a decision time...if he wants to stay with girl and child he only has to wait 'till she is 16 and she can do what she wants herself...in the meantime I would give the controlling, threatening parents a wide berth !! good luck to them whatever they decide
It's only 'statutory rape' if the victim is under 13 years of age. [Sexual Offences Act 2003, Section 5]
The relevant offence here is 'sexual activity with a child'. [Sexual Offences Act 2003, Section 9]. Where an offender is 18 years of age or older the maximum penalty is 14 years imprisonment. Where (as here) the offender is under 18 the maximum penalty is 5 years imprisonment. [Sexual Offences Act, Section 13].
Whether the CPS would decide to launch a prosecution is difficult to say. In my teaching days (1970s and 80s) quite a few 15yo girls became pregnant (with the identity of the baby's teenage father undisputed) but I can't remember a single prosecution. However attitudes have changed and it's possible that the CPS might decide to charge the offender.
Even so, if the girl was a willing participant (even though she can't legally have given consent), then a custodial sentence would not be considered. That means that, if the male is a first-time offender, the only possible sentence would be a Youth Rehabilitation Order:
http:// www.inb rief.co .uk/cou rt-judg ements/ youth-r ehabili tation- order.h tm#
The relevant offence here is 'sexual activity with a child'. [Sexual Offences Act 2003, Section 9]. Where an offender is 18 years of age or older the maximum penalty is 14 years imprisonment. Where (as here) the offender is under 18 the maximum penalty is 5 years imprisonment. [Sexual Offences Act, Section 13].
Whether the CPS would decide to launch a prosecution is difficult to say. In my teaching days (1970s and 80s) quite a few 15yo girls became pregnant (with the identity of the baby's teenage father undisputed) but I can't remember a single prosecution. However attitudes have changed and it's possible that the CPS might decide to charge the offender.
Even so, if the girl was a willing participant (even though she can't legally have given consent), then a custodial sentence would not be considered. That means that, if the male is a first-time offender, the only possible sentence would be a Youth Rehabilitation Order:
http://
under the old act ( god I feel my age ) Sexual offences act 1957
if a man under 24 has sex with a girl under 16 ( so your son would qualify ) then there is a defence to unlawful sexual intercourse
but the defence automatically means a guilty plea to indecent assault
Has that gone the way or the world or did it survive the 2003 act ?
anyone know ?
if a man under 24 has sex with a girl under 16 ( so your son would qualify ) then there is a defence to unlawful sexual intercourse
but the defence automatically means a guilty plea to indecent assault
Has that gone the way or the world or did it survive the 2003 act ?
anyone know ?