Arts & Literature1 min ago
Low Cost Holidaymakers Likely To Get Just £7.78 Refund
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/bu siness- 3683440 8
"It was not registered with the UK government-backed Atol scheme, which would have compensated them in full"
An object lesson here, to choose a holiday firm that is registered with ATOL it would seem.... We have had enough warnings on this subject, you would have thought the public would have got the message by now.
"It was not registered with the UK government-backed Atol scheme, which would have compensated them in full"
An object lesson here, to choose a holiday firm that is registered with ATOL it would seem.... We have had enough warnings on this subject, you would have thought the public would have got the message by now.
Answers
"ATOL doesn't spring to mind," OG. It's been around since the 70"s and even adverts on today's tv adverts state, ATOL, protected. Shame for them, but they should have checked.
11:52 Tue 19th Jul 2016
Can someone tell me why a UK travel company wouldn't be ATOL registered, is it purely down to cost. Do firms who do not have an ATOL scheme but may be registered like Low Cost Holidaymakers in a different country offer holidays substantially cheaper if they are not ATOL protected. If not why would anyone not choose a travel firm that wasn't ATOL protected?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.