News8 mins ago
Section 20 Football Tackle
16 Answers
Hello. My husband was playing football and tackled somebody, he was shoulder to shoulder and because he was travelling faster than the other guy his opponent ended up falling and injuring his wrists. About 6 months later my husband is informed that criminal charges will be taking place and was called into the station to make a statement. He did this and the police officer told him it would be likely be the last he would hear about it. Now all of a sudden my husband is being charged with section 20! What is he likely outcome? At the time the police took statements from 4 of the opponents froends but only only 1 from my husbands team. Doesn't seem fair and seems a bit extreme for a tackle even if they guy did suffer a broken bone. Has anyone experienced anything similar? It's worrying with three young children including a newborn
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Football123abc. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If your husband is being charged or cautioned under the Public Order Act for assault under section 20, he may even have a charge Of Grievious Bodily Harm to face. This sounds somewhat heavy handed to me and I would recommend that you get proper legal advice. A quick search shows that the max sentence is 5 years imprisonment but there are various clauses and recommendations regarding sporting events and the like. Methinks that the opponent who was injured is pushing for a conviction with the hope of a compensation claim, and I would definitely get some advice. You could try the Citizens Advice Bureau for free advice and hope that Barmaid pops up to give you some advice here on the Bank.
yes the queens writ runs on a football field
and yes you need advice
and no the cost of defending will NOT outweigh the cost of a conviction thro trying to Do It Yourself
It will depend on your lawyer arguing a game is most risks
and his lawyer ( Crown ) will argue the queen's writ runs on a football field and no he didnt accept the risk of having the crap kicked out of him.
go for a jury trial
jurors are more likely to play footie or have seen one in the last ten years than a judge
on such a serious charge and its consequences of (unfair,undeserved) conviction - you need to lay out on a lawyer
I am not sure if you should wait until he is charged
I t hink a lwyer at this stage would wait and see
and yes you need advice
and no the cost of defending will NOT outweigh the cost of a conviction thro trying to Do It Yourself
It will depend on your lawyer arguing a game is most risks
and his lawyer ( Crown ) will argue the queen's writ runs on a football field and no he didnt accept the risk of having the crap kicked out of him.
go for a jury trial
jurors are more likely to play footie or have seen one in the last ten years than a judge
on such a serious charge and its consequences of (unfair,undeserved) conviction - you need to lay out on a lawyer
I am not sure if you should wait until he is charged
I t hink a lwyer at this stage would wait and see
Some interesting reading on Regina v Brown 1994 here:
http:// obiterj .blogsp ot.co.u k/2013/ 04/when -contac t-in-sp ort-bec omes-cr iminal. html
http://