Road rules1 min ago
low copy number dna.
on october 20th the court of appeal will hear the case of david and terry reed,two brothers convicted of murder on low copy number dna evidence,
apparantly the outcome of this appeal could have international ramifications,
does anyone think it is still safe to use to convict someone.
apparantly the outcome of this appeal could have international ramifications,
does anyone think it is still safe to use to convict someone.
Answers
Only 1 answer
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jannyneve. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I don't think it can ever be used as it always introduces reasonable doubt. It is important for convictions to be safe or guilty people can go free on a technicality or innocent people convicted. If the amount of DNA at the scene is so small that it could have come from transfer rather than the person's actual presence, it introduces doubt.
Obviously if there is a large DNA sample present, i.e. can't possibly have been caused by transfer, then that is completely different.
Obviously if there is a large DNA sample present, i.e. can't possibly have been caused by transfer, then that is completely different.
Only 1 answer
