Only The A F D Can Save Germany
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Synigence. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It depends on the car manufacturer/engine maker as to when to replace the cambelt. Some are 48,000 miles, others are 60k, 72k, 96k but I've never come across 115k? Is that in Km and not Miles?
Also oil/coolant contamination can cause premature belt wear and can cause it to fail. If there is any sign of the slightest bit of contamination then they will not support your claim. It's worth having it looked at and see what explanation they have?
you don't say what car you have, and although it is under the recomended mileage a lot of manufactuers also give a time ie. 4 years. a lot of things can cause a belt to fail, oil leak (belt contamiation) water pump or idler pulley seizure or collapse, and although it's recomended to change at a specific mileage there is also a mileage for inspect/adjust.
Dougie
I sympathise with you because exactly the same thing happened to me recently when I lost power and it turned out the cambelt had gone.
I have a slightly less impressive Fiat brava 1.8ELX and they recommend the belt should be changed at 72000 miles. My own stupid fault - when it went I'd done c.77000 ..... so I really kicked myself for postponing the 72000 service like I did (prior to that I'd always had the car service on the dot by a main dealer). Cost of repair was about �650 in the end.
However, in your case, I'd say that Audi have a duty of care to their customers and, if they advise their drivers that xyz is changed at xyz interval, then most drivers would trust that they have been given sound advice straight from the horse's mouth as it were .... and maintain their car as advised.
Like others have pointed out, I think that if the belt went through "wear and tear / old age" and not as a result of another malfunction within the engine, then you'd have a very good case against Audi and a good argument that they should pay to repair all the damage.
Are Audi completely disinterested, or would they be prepared to consider - say - an independent garage's "forensic" report on what went wrong, why they think this happened, and the resultant damage ?
Meant to add ....
.... if it turns out that you've always done what audi's advised re: servicing & replacement parts, AND the belt went through wear and tear only, AND Audi still won't accept responsibility, I'd threaten to report them to Watchdog ! They love well known brand names trying to wriggle out of doing the right thing - especially when it's there in black & white.