ChatterBank0 min ago
3rd Child Dies: Your Heart Goes Out To The Families.
30 Answers
http:// news.uk .msn.co ...es-i n-canoe -traged y-1
Out of six people in the canoe, three children dead, one of the fathers is missing presumed drowned. They were on Loch Gairloch, an extremely large expanse of water in relation to their canoe, and which flows into the Sea of the Hebrides, part of the North Atlantic.
Should they have been there in the first place? I only ask this because bearing in mind the ages of the three kids who have perished, i.e. 2years, and two of them 5 years, weren't the two adults taking a massive risk in the first place?
How can the two families ever hope to get over this? My heart goes out to them in these dark days.
Out of six people in the canoe, three children dead, one of the fathers is missing presumed drowned. They were on Loch Gairloch, an extremely large expanse of water in relation to their canoe, and which flows into the Sea of the Hebrides, part of the North Atlantic.
Should they have been there in the first place? I only ask this because bearing in mind the ages of the three kids who have perished, i.e. 2years, and two of them 5 years, weren't the two adults taking a massive risk in the first place?
How can the two families ever hope to get over this? My heart goes out to them in these dark days.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by eyethenkyew. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Far more children die as passengers in cars than die as passengers in canoes. A dual carriageway carries as many dangers as a scottish lake. Assuming the adults were experienced canoeists then the trip would have seemed no more dangerous than us taking our children or grand children out in the car.
Life is not without risks and some unfortunately are unlucky.
Life is not without risks and some unfortunately are unlucky.
I don't really accept the comparison between this tragedy and driving your kids somewhere in the car. Yes, of course there are obvious dangers in that, we all accept that, but the number of kids carried in cars probably outweighs those taken out in a canoe on a great loch not far off the North Atlantic by many millions to one, therefore the laws of average dictate that car accidents will claim some lives.
And I have no idea if either adult had any great experience of canoeing, so you're merely guessing there. Even if they did, it's not something which the vast majority of us normally do, especially with young sprogs in tow, and my main point is that, tragic though it was, it was very avoidable under the circumstances as I've explained them.
And I have no idea if either adult had any great experience of canoeing, so you're merely guessing there. Even if they did, it's not something which the vast majority of us normally do, especially with young sprogs in tow, and my main point is that, tragic though it was, it was very avoidable under the circumstances as I've explained them.
In a kayak, you sense automatically that you are responsible for the stability of the boat. In a canadian there is a feeling of security and youngsters can easily forget their responsibility and put too much weight into the stroke so that it can go over, especially if the person in the stern becomes distracted from his job of compensating lack of balance. I have felt much safer, offshore in my sea kayak than with youngsters in a canadian canoe.
I wondered exactly what was meant by 'buoyancy aids'. Might they have been something as simple as blow-up arm-bands? Certainly they do not appear to have been devices that would keep floating children face up. Whatever...taking four young children to sea thus equipped and in such a craft, whilst wearing no life-jacket oneself, seems like utter folly to me.
It is all desperately sad, of course, and I feel for the surviving family members, but...
It is all desperately sad, of course, and I feel for the surviving family members, but...
awful tragic story. Can't understand why such young children were in the boat, nor why they weren't wearing proper life jackets. Rescue officer said the boat wasn't particularly stable, and that the children were found face down. that had they being wearing life jackets the chances of their survival would be have been greatly increased.
'buoyancy aids' are exactly what they say,which are fine if you have the basics of swimming & survival exactly what many kids dont have, especially a 2year old.. life jackets are designed to keep you on your back with your face out of the water quite important if you are unconscious. I checked this out as i take 2 of my grandsons out with Kayaks (only on a river) wearing buoyancy aids but they are both very strong swimmers. I expect the father thought he was doing the right thing...it was only this story that made me find out the difference..
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.