ChatterBank2 mins ago
Lance Armstrong: The Lying Continues....
4 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ sport/0 /cyclin g/21523 597
So LA won't give evidence under oath to USADA?
Says it all really. His continued protestation that he was clean in the comeback looks less and less credible, which everyone knew.
Furthermore he'd probably have to implicate someone at the UCI too as he maintains they asked him for money.
I reckon he'll have to give evidence under oath in a federal court though because there are a lot of people who want their money back.
If he doesn't co-operate soon he could be looking at getting a stripey suntan!
So LA won't give evidence under oath to USADA?
Says it all really. His continued protestation that he was clean in the comeback looks less and less credible, which everyone knew.
Furthermore he'd probably have to implicate someone at the UCI too as he maintains they asked him for money.
I reckon he'll have to give evidence under oath in a federal court though because there are a lot of people who want their money back.
If he doesn't co-operate soon he could be looking at getting a stripey suntan!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ChillDoubt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.