Religion & Spirituality2 mins ago
Inheritance And My Benefits
hi, im due to receive inheritance of 20k im all benefits including dla , im so worried im going to lose all my benefits so therefor i dont wont the money , does anyone know if i can give it all to my daughter who is just starting out in life , please help im so worried ...
Answers
I hope I don't get shot for saying this (and I do really understand just how worrying it must be to lose the benefits - especially when I know how hard it is to get them restored at a later date) ... but ... ... surely the point of means-tested benefits is to be a safety-net from 'society', for people who have no other means of support. If you become able, whether...
12:20 Thu 09th May 2013
Sara - how do the benefits people view a Deed of Variation under s142 Inheritance Tax Act 1984? That bit of legislation states that if a DoV is done within 2 years of death it is "written back" into the Will so that it is assumed to have been a disposition by the deceased rather than the beneficiary.
I accept if the OP received the money and passed it on it would be deprivation, but s142 puts a different legal spin on it because it is as if the bequest never existed in the first place.
I accept if the OP received the money and passed it on it would be deprivation, but s142 puts a different legal spin on it because it is as if the bequest never existed in the first place.
I hope I don't get shot for saying this (and I do really understand just how worrying it must be to lose the benefits - especially when I know how hard it is to get them restored at a later date) ... but ...
... surely the point of means-tested benefits is to be a safety-net from 'society', for people who have no other means of support.
If you become able, whether through an inheritance, lottery win or any other windfall, to support yourself for a period of time then surely it is actually wrong to expect to be able to continue to receive the means-tested element of an benefit income?
... surely the point of means-tested benefits is to be a safety-net from 'society', for people who have no other means of support.
If you become able, whether through an inheritance, lottery win or any other windfall, to support yourself for a period of time then surely it is actually wrong to expect to be able to continue to receive the means-tested element of an benefit income?
Thank you for all your comments , i totally understand what your saying sunny- dave the reason i dont wont the money is im under the mental health team and the stress of reclaiming my benefits is to much for me to cope wiith, im housebound most of the time unless i can get family to take me anywhere and my daughter has been there threw it all so it would be a nice gift for the start of her life in the big world if you see what i mean , if i couldnt give it to her then surly i dont have to accept it ...
It may be possible to put the cash into a trust fund from which you draw cash for things you need but as it is not 'yours' directly you can still keep the benefits. I have heard of lottery wins etc being paid this way so the recipients can keep benefits. Morally wrong but I don't think it is illegal .
Then again as said you will not lose the DLA as that is not means tested. So possibly you can just keep the cash and be free of benefits for a while?
Then again as said you will not lose the DLA as that is not means tested. So possibly you can just keep the cash and be free of benefits for a while?
Barmaid - I think I'm right in saying the Deed of Variation has to be signed by the original beneficiary, in which case liz69 would be signing away the inheritance & I'm confident that would be seen as deprivation.
Sharingan - the rules are various & can be quite complex. It's just not possible to set out anything definite because they can depend to a considerable extent on the circumstances of the claimant. For example, if liz69 is over pension credit age (at present somewhere between 60 & 65) and she uses the money to pay off her debts that would be OK. But if she is under that age & uses it in the same way it is not OK, unless the debt she pays is one which she is under a legal liability to pay immediately. Or it may be she has a very old clapped out car & has an essential need to have a reliable car, in which case she might be able to justify expenditure on a replacement. And there are lots of other circumstances that can affect what is accepted.
Sharingan - the rules are various & can be quite complex. It's just not possible to set out anything definite because they can depend to a considerable extent on the circumstances of the claimant. For example, if liz69 is over pension credit age (at present somewhere between 60 & 65) and she uses the money to pay off her debts that would be OK. But if she is under that age & uses it in the same way it is not OK, unless the debt she pays is one which she is under a legal liability to pay immediately. Or it may be she has a very old clapped out car & has an essential need to have a reliable car, in which case she might be able to justify expenditure on a replacement. And there are lots of other circumstances that can affect what is accepted.
Sorry - I got interrupted. If there are no "one off" type expenditure items DWP deem the savings to be used up gradually over a period on ordinary living costs, but again the amount they deem acceptable will depend on circumstances - eg much more for a family than for a single person.
liz69 - I sympathise because it can be difficult to get some means tested benefits back but you mustn't do anything which leads DWP (or your Council if you get HB/CTB) to believe you are trying to bend the system. If you do you could be in much more trouble than just having to claim benefits back. My view is that you have to accept the inheritance (even disclaiming it will be treated as deprivation), let the authorities know, keep records of what it is spent on (being careful not to splash out on gifts etc.) & then re-claim when the savings drop down to £16000. If your daughter has acted as an unpaid carer to you for some time it may be worth discussing with DWP whether they would accept that passing some of the money to her as recompense would be considered reasonable.
liz69 - I sympathise because it can be difficult to get some means tested benefits back but you mustn't do anything which leads DWP (or your Council if you get HB/CTB) to believe you are trying to bend the system. If you do you could be in much more trouble than just having to claim benefits back. My view is that you have to accept the inheritance (even disclaiming it will be treated as deprivation), let the authorities know, keep records of what it is spent on (being careful not to splash out on gifts etc.) & then re-claim when the savings drop down to £16000. If your daughter has acted as an unpaid carer to you for some time it may be worth discussing with DWP whether they would accept that passing some of the money to her as recompense would be considered reasonable.