Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Gbh Sec18
18 Answers
im currentley on bail for a sec18 gbh with out the intent wat happened was i was dwn my local pub enjoyin the singer thay had there it was goin fine all night until the end me and my gf was sittin up by the womens toliets wen this man came up to our table from out of the blue and blamed me for takeing is court so at this point nw i havent gt a clue wat he is on about well anyway he finds is court well the barstaff did and he trys to say sorry to me so im going on one nw and want except is apolagee and tell him to gt frm me with that a swang a punch at me so the 2 of us nw r fighting then i see anther 3or4 boys jumpin me well anyway the land loard told me to leve to witch i did i went home i grabbed a hammer and i was going bk dwn but before i could gt bk to the pub the police had me to witch thay c.s. gased me y thay did this i dont knw as i didnt resist an arrest well anyway i go to police station nw in interview thay tell me that hes saying i stabbed him i never dun no such thing the guy is sayin aswell that i was the agressive one the landloard of the pub is sayin aswell that it was all me nothing av been said about the other ppl who jumped me thay sayin it was all me the guy is sayin that he never hit me but yet my face was in a really bad way the police thought that my cheek bone was fragshued wen i gt bail pending ferther inquries i went to the hospitail about my face nting was broke it was badley swollen thats all its been goin on nw for 3 months everytime i keep going bk to the police station thay keep on bailein me saying that thay still waiteing for everdance ive gt a realy bad recorde aswell so this is my concern cos if i go nt gulity nw thay can use my recordes as a bad charicter refe runce and it will go agaist me want iti havent got anything for violince tho never have i ben dun for this kind of thing before ive always been dun for driveing shopliftting stuff like that never for fighting can u plz helpme with sum good edvice lookin forward to hear from u all thanks
Answers
Is there an English version of this?
23:03 Wed 15th May 2013
-- answer removed --
I can't understand a word of what happened but, S18 is GBH WITH Intent .
GBH WITHOUT intent is section 20.
Section 18 is always a prison sentence, section 20 gives you a chance of a non custodial sentence though prison is still possible.
Section 18 is a lot more serious, you really need to be sure which one you are charged with. S 18 or S 20.
If I understand correctly you left the pub after a fight, went home and got a hammer, while heading back to the pub with the hammer you were arrested.
Sorry, that looks to me like Section 18, you are looking at around 3 years in prison, your 'previous' will count against you even though it was not for violence.
GBH WITHOUT intent is section 20.
Section 18 is always a prison sentence, section 20 gives you a chance of a non custodial sentence though prison is still possible.
Section 18 is a lot more serious, you really need to be sure which one you are charged with. S 18 or S 20.
If I understand correctly you left the pub after a fight, went home and got a hammer, while heading back to the pub with the hammer you were arrested.
Sorry, that looks to me like Section 18, you are looking at around 3 years in prison, your 'previous' will count against you even though it was not for violence.
If I get it right, you haven't been charged. No worry yet. The police are still trying to find witnesses and get witness statements. Until they do, nobody will know what you're facing. Then if they charge you, come back on here, but do split your post into blocks of a few lines. On your account you haven't committed any offence; you seem not to have started a fight and only fought back; apart from, apparently, having an offensive weapon, a hammer, in a public place
-- answer removed --
Fred, the 1st line of the question says he is on bail for section 18 GBH. I thought that he is saying he has been charged. I know it's almost impossible to understand with out a single instance of punctuation , but that's how I read it. I am still not certain this is not a 'wind up' the grammar is so bad I suspect it may be intentional.
-- answer removed --
You may have noticed that law books you were reading had punctuation, full stops and stuff. Your account is very difficult to understand when it is one long unpunctuated piece.
Your previous convictions will not go in evidence in a trial, as a rule. Exceptionally they may do, but basically only if they go to proving something important in the trial. They can't be put in evidence simply to show you have been violent before and so you must have been an attacker and guilty this time ! That wouldn't be fair or logical
Your previous convictions will not go in evidence in a trial, as a rule. Exceptionally they may do, but basically only if they go to proving something important in the trial. They can't be put in evidence simply to show you have been violent before and so you must have been an attacker and guilty this time ! That wouldn't be fair or logical
've gt a realy bad recorde aswell so this is my concern cos if i go nt gulity nw thay can use my recordes as a bad charicter'
See attached link ref Bad Character Evidence, in particular the Seven Gateways of Admissibility:
http:// www.cps .gov.uk /legal/ a_to_c/ bad_cha racter_ evidenc e/
(please refrain from being abusive to people who are trying to assist you here)
See attached link ref Bad Character Evidence, in particular the Seven Gateways of Admissibility:
http://
(please refrain from being abusive to people who are trying to assist you here)