Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
Employment Reference
What redress does a person have, if trying to get a new job, their previous employer gives a bad reference without just cause?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If it's any consolation, she wouldn't win if she have the funds to sue. When an employer gives a reference which is unfavourable, the offended party has one heck of a hill to climb. They'd have to show there was deliberate malice and the stating of untruths which the employer couldn't reasonably have thought to be true. The courts jealously guard an employer's right to give an opinion, and to make what seems to be a personal assessment which is genuinely made. Your case doesn't sound anywhere near overcomimg that
If you dont have a loss - the you cant sue
if the ref says she was dismissed for groos misconduct following a medication error, then it is in no way defamatory or misleading because that is what happened.
Since the young lady GOT the job - your case is even weaker in terms of losses.
however - if the reference signer is a nurse herself - you could always try to NMC (nurses' GMC) - they are even keener to strike off innocent personnel than GMC - no, dont refer your daughter, refer the one who gave the reference.
(but she does have to registered)
Honestly theland, altho you are outraged, I am not sure if you have a case.
[ and you dont either as you're not prepared to spend money on it - correcctly in my opinion]
if the ref says she was dismissed for groos misconduct following a medication error, then it is in no way defamatory or misleading because that is what happened.
Since the young lady GOT the job - your case is even weaker in terms of losses.
however - if the reference signer is a nurse herself - you could always try to NMC (nurses' GMC) - they are even keener to strike off innocent personnel than GMC - no, dont refer your daughter, refer the one who gave the reference.
(but she does have to registered)
Honestly theland, altho you are outraged, I am not sure if you have a case.
[ and you dont either as you're not prepared to spend money on it - correcctly in my opinion]
A 'No win no fee' lawyer will only take a case where they can be virtually certain of winning. The chance of a win has to be well over 50% for them to take the case.
I am sorry but in this case I think your chance of winning is under 10%.
Has your daughter considered signing on for temping agency that specialises in nursing? It could be a way to get back in employment, I know several nurses that do this.
I am sorry but in this case I think your chance of winning is under 10%.
Has your daughter considered signing on for temping agency that specialises in nursing? It could be a way to get back in employment, I know several nurses that do this.
usually in the NHS - the evil deed (cr+p references) are done by phone
and not by writing cross-eyed references like
if you get this young lady to work for you - you will indeed be fortunate
Medication errors are commonly the subject of disciplinaries
because they are preventable
and there are many experts out there for hire who will cheerfully say:
X or Y is paid to dispense medication in the correct dose.
it is the same for prescription errors.
[ just in case anyone is going eeer - prescription, dispensing and administration are just three, but different steps in the care path from pink ward sheet to the patient's mouth ]
These errors used to be directly reportable to the Ministry
but the rules may have been relaxed since then.
Obviously no admin wishes to have a man from the ministry gazinng at them over half-moon glasses.
and not by writing cross-eyed references like
if you get this young lady to work for you - you will indeed be fortunate
Medication errors are commonly the subject of disciplinaries
because they are preventable
and there are many experts out there for hire who will cheerfully say:
X or Y is paid to dispense medication in the correct dose.
it is the same for prescription errors.
[ just in case anyone is going eeer - prescription, dispensing and administration are just three, but different steps in the care path from pink ward sheet to the patient's mouth ]
These errors used to be directly reportable to the Ministry
but the rules may have been relaxed since then.
Obviously no admin wishes to have a man from the ministry gazinng at them over half-moon glasses.
There are some good answers on her but I think many answers misunderstand the two cases- that of the daughter (who Theland says was dismissed unfairly and is now unemployed) and the daughter in law (who supported the daughter in her disciplinary and got a bad reference but still managed to get a new job so left her old job)