ChatterBank3 mins ago
Plebgate Officer Jailed For 12 Months
24 Answers
Just on Sky News Ticker.
It's the officer who claimed to have witnessed the Plebgate Incident, but obviously didn't.
I hope for his sake that PC Toby Rowland has got his own story straight......
It's the officer who claimed to have witnessed the Plebgate Incident, but obviously didn't.
I hope for his sake that PC Toby Rowland has got his own story straight......
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ChillDoubt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.3T - no I am not aghast.
all it means is that you havent seen someone lie in public office.
His defence - and it is so stupid it may be a spoof - was that he thought he was elsewhere (erm outside 10 Downing st that is ! ) and was hearing voices.....( that would be plebs ! plebs ! )
for myself I didnt believe that what he said he saw was untrue
I mean with CCTV you have to be pretty crazy to say I was there when I wasnt
But there were other incredible things - the 'top' civil servant asked to investigate didnt ask for the CCTV and when asked why not, said - he was asked to review not to investigate.
He (the toppo civil servant) is also doing Amritsar - and I have checked - he says he has read the papers on the subject this time.....
all it means is that you havent seen someone lie in public office.
His defence - and it is so stupid it may be a spoof - was that he thought he was elsewhere (erm outside 10 Downing st that is ! ) and was hearing voices.....( that would be plebs ! plebs ! )
for myself I didnt believe that what he said he saw was untrue
I mean with CCTV you have to be pretty crazy to say I was there when I wasnt
But there were other incredible things - the 'top' civil servant asked to investigate didnt ask for the CCTV and when asked why not, said - he was asked to review not to investigate.
He (the toppo civil servant) is also doing Amritsar - and I have checked - he says he has read the papers on the subject this time.....
// I think he was pretty lucky considering that he lied to attempt to incriminate a cabinet minister and the amount of time and money spent investigating the matter //
He was. It's a lenient sentence. The fact that he lost his job and pension is the real punishment. It's a shame that there's 'insufficient evidence' to find out who the other liars are in this case and punish them as well.
It's still the case that either Mitchell or the other police officers are lying. I know who my money's on.
He was. It's a lenient sentence. The fact that he lost his job and pension is the real punishment. It's a shame that there's 'insufficient evidence' to find out who the other liars are in this case and punish them as well.
It's still the case that either Mitchell or the other police officers are lying. I know who my money's on.
T3
If police officers are allowed to lie about what they witnessed people say and do - and get away with it
Or, if found out, have the matter resolved 'between the chaps' nice and quietly
How long do you think our Justice System would retain credibility or validity
Or are you suggesting this is business as usual, police officers are normally lying when they give evidence against someone and its naive to think otherwise
If police officers are allowed to lie about what they witnessed people say and do - and get away with it
Or, if found out, have the matter resolved 'between the chaps' nice and quietly
How long do you think our Justice System would retain credibility or validity
Or are you suggesting this is business as usual, police officers are normally lying when they give evidence against someone and its naive to think otherwise
I said "one side fitted up the other", I did NOT say "both sides fitted up each other", do try and read what is written.
This is like a playground fight when the teacher goes over and breaks it up and says "right you two it's over shake hands or you are both in detention". That's the point I'm making surely there must have been a "teacher" somewhere who could have made them "shake hands".
Are we saying that from the outset the police contrived the whole thing to fit up the minister?
This is like a playground fight when the teacher goes over and breaks it up and says "right you two it's over shake hands or you are both in detention". That's the point I'm making surely there must have been a "teacher" somewhere who could have made them "shake hands".
Are we saying that from the outset the police contrived the whole thing to fit up the minister?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.