Donate SIGN UP

Diverting/changing Water Course

Avatar Image
neddyw | 20:45 Fri 21st Mar 2014 | Law
3 Answers
The builders developing a site near my mum's have re-routed a stream so that it now flows done an artificial waterfall, goes through the garden of one of the new properties then carries on its original course. The original stream bed formed the boundary between the site and the property next door. Can they legally do this? If the changes now create a flooding risk, who will be responsible, the builder or the new home owner?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by neddyw. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
neddy, it didn't FORM the boundary, It MARKED the boundary. The boundary stays where it is even though the stream has moved.
email builders for them to confirm that their alteration of the water course will not be detrimental or flood your mums property.

Confirmation from builder will give you leverage to act further if necessary.
I wonder if the builders have complied with this?...

http://www.wlma.org.uk/uploads/BIDB_Application_to_alter_a_watercourse.pdf

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Diverting/changing Water Course

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.