having the great (mis) fortune to have a construction health and safety professional in the family, we can't watch programs like "grand designs" without enormous shouting and cries of "where's your edge protection...?"
what i wanted to know though, was if the builders are doing blatantly dangerous things, and it's recorded for the program but no-one gets injured, could the H+s executive retrospectively prosecute someone after the prog was shown?
my bloke now has his black card and he's a nightmare, just the same he's nothing much good to say about the H & S exec cos he says it's all more about getting eejits in work ,
various agencies trawl thro the progz gathering evidence
benefits investigators pay themselvr to watch lotto programmes
because the winnings have to be declared
the incident was that a side-member had been filmed receiving a post code lotto win and then was in court on benefits fraud
but as you can see if you access it - I cant quite locate it amongst all the detail
but I was definitely thinking of the ad where they carry in a huge card board cheque for £20k - cue grossly overweight women screaming -
and then finding one lucky winnerwas on benefits.... In Droylsden - cue court case
I thought prosecutions under H&S laws occurred only if employers did not provide the correct safety equipment or made their employees work in ways that against the H&S rules. I thought it is the employers that get prosecuted, not the employees.
As a home owner I could not be prosecuted if I repair my guttering by standing on the roof barefoot in a thunderstorm with no safety gear. If I was an employer and forced my employee to do that, I could be prosecuted.