Directions Questionnaire (Small Claims Track)

[joko]

I am just filling one of these in and one question says - do you agree that the small claims track is the appropropriate track for this case?
If no say why not and state the track to which you believe it should be allocated.

out of the 3 main options small claims IS the most appropriate - but actually NONE are appropriate as there is no actual debt owed.

I want to get the case thrown out, i want a judge to see it and agree its nonsense, but i dont seem to be able to find anyway of asking for that to happen

i dont want to say yes here, in case it means i agree that it is a valid case

is this the space i would write that it is not a valid case etc?

I have already explained all that in my defence but they still allocated it for the small claims track - though i suspect that is purely based on the low amount involved.

i really dont want to keep dealing with this idiotic case, and i certainly dont want to have actually go to court.

what should i do?

thanks
(please see in my profile a few previous of my questions for further details on the case - ccjs etc)

[Buenchico]

You are simply being asked whether you agree that the matter should be heard before a judge, which is exactly what you want to happen, not to indicate whether or not you agree to the claim. (If you actually agreed with the claim it would be madness to take it before a judge anyway, as that would only add to your costs; you'd simply need to pay up).

So stick with the small claims track.

[Barmaid]

Yes, stick with small claims. This is effectively an allocation question - ie - which track should this be allocated to. From what i recall, SCT is appropriate.

[Peter Pedant]

yeah agree above

yes you do want to stick with the small claims track

[ Hi Barmy how ya doin ' ? ]

[joko]

ok i wll do that then, thanks all