ChatterBank5 mins ago
Employment Law
13 Answers
My better half was working at a pub/restaurant for about five years when the landlady decided to sell and move on. Better half was told the new owners would carry on employing her. The place shut for a few weeks during the sale so obviously no work during that period. But, when the place reopened and she went to work her shift the new owners told her there was no job! So she's not been sacked or laid off so surely she should still have job in theory. Can an employer just decide to do that? Anyone know if this is legal. Seems a bit odd to me.
TIA
TIA
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by wallis1007. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The principles are straightforward
Mrs W was told that employment would be continued ( does he have any evidence for this like a letter ? )
and so the rules in TUPE apply
he has been unfairly dismissed and so can sue for this ( and I think gets one weeks money for each year employed )
first sto p is the CAB who can look over what you have
and then onto an employment lawyer who may ( incredibly ) take it on on a no win no fee basis
It strikes me she has a job and has been unfairly dismissed
Mrs W was told that employment would be continued ( does he have any evidence for this like a letter ? )
and so the rules in TUPE apply
he has been unfairly dismissed and so can sue for this ( and I think gets one weeks money for each year employed )
first sto p is the CAB who can look over what you have
and then onto an employment lawyer who may ( incredibly ) take it on on a no win no fee basis
It strikes me she has a job and has been unfairly dismissed
I recommend she contact ACAS who have a free helpline - no question about her having a case for re-employment under her original terms.
http:// m.acas. org.uk/ index.a spx?art icleid= 2042
http://
I can answer Eddie's question
yes she did have a contract of employment if she turned up regularly and got paid and since it is more than two years should be protected
whether it was written or not is irrelevant. ( the only alternative for [work-money changing hands] would be contract for services and I can tell you she didnt have one of those
yes she did have a contract of employment if she turned up regularly and got paid and since it is more than two years should be protected
whether it was written or not is irrelevant. ( the only alternative for [work-money changing hands] would be contract for services and I can tell you she didnt have one of those
TUPE depends on the facts of the case
if as stated the business was bought and sold
then it is a question of law and not choice for the employer
also if you think about it
as TUPE would put her in the position of HER telling the employer what her oral contract was - I would like to see the employer's fact at that
getting her job back is possible under the legislation
but as an outcome is pretty unlikely
compo is more likely
if as stated the business was bought and sold
then it is a question of law and not choice for the employer
also if you think about it
as TUPE would put her in the position of HER telling the employer what her oral contract was - I would like to see the employer's fact at that
getting her job back is possible under the legislation
but as an outcome is pretty unlikely
compo is more likely
https:/ /www.ts sa.org. uk/en/Y our-uni on/your -workpl ace/emp loyment -rights /tupe-- a-guide -to-the -regula tions.c fm
This site explains it quite well, and sole traders selling business is mentioned. Might be worth her printing out and taking it with her when she meets with them.
This site explains it quite well, and sole traders selling business is mentioned. Might be worth her printing out and taking it with her when she meets with them.
Yes, I'd expect the terms of the sale of the business to be relevant, but I don't think we have enough info other than to say see ACAS and there will be an entitlement to compensation for notice, possibly unfair dismissal or redundancy, probably statutory if the business was no longer a going concern
It would be unlawful to carry on a casual arrangement of cash in hand over this length of time, but it undoubtedly happens. She did have an employment contract.
ACAS would be the best people to help unravel this at this late stage, but on the evidence thus far the outgoing landlady had a legal duty under TUPE to consult and it appears she failed to do this.
At this late stage, ACAS may well conclude she seems to have been dismissed without notice, unfairly. Getting a job back off the new owner is unlikely, and the best outcome would be money for unfair dismissal.
ACAS would be the best people to help unravel this at this late stage, but on the evidence thus far the outgoing landlady had a legal duty under TUPE to consult and it appears she failed to do this.
At this late stage, ACAS may well conclude she seems to have been dismissed without notice, unfairly. Getting a job back off the new owner is unlikely, and the best outcome would be money for unfair dismissal.