ChatterBank0 min ago
16 Year Old, Should Be Given A Flat So She Could Live Under Stricter Codes Of Islamic Behaviour, Because Her Parents Are Not Strict Enough Muslims?
56 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
It would appear that this girl obtained a second passport under a pretence.
If her parents kept her under survelliance once she had returned then,in this case, I reckon the parents did their best to keep her away from extremism and this hideous religion.
Perhaps she should be taken to a secure institution and be de Islamified or whatever the word I seek. She has been severely brainwashed I believe and this idiot of a judge has no one's best interest at heart.
Of course. If she is so smart at 16 and worthy of a flat she could be packed off back to Pakistan and live ina more religious environment.!!!
If her parents kept her under survelliance once she had returned then,in this case, I reckon the parents did their best to keep her away from extremism and this hideous religion.
Perhaps she should be taken to a secure institution and be de Islamified or whatever the word I seek. She has been severely brainwashed I believe and this idiot of a judge has no one's best interest at heart.
Of course. If she is so smart at 16 and worthy of a flat she could be packed off back to Pakistan and live ina more religious environment.!!!
-- answer removed --
Old_Geezer
Apparently she changed her mind.
I'm not a parent, so I don't know what it's like to feel responsible for another human being, but I honestly think at this point, the family would be within their rights to say, "Your bed...you lie in it."
And no - Enfield Council should not be under an obligation to house her.
She's not vulnerable.
She's a dumbass.
Apparently she changed her mind.
I'm not a parent, so I don't know what it's like to feel responsible for another human being, but I honestly think at this point, the family would be within their rights to say, "Your bed...you lie in it."
And no - Enfield Council should not be under an obligation to house her.
She's not vulnerable.
She's a dumbass.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Hi AOG - I removed the posts which were off-topic moaning about post removal.
Maybe you'd like me to reinstate the one that called you a rude word, and all the others about something other than the topic you have presented... ?
Or you could get on talking about the subject instead, which I assume you have an opinion on?
Maybe you'd like me to reinstate the one that called you a rude word, and all the others about something other than the topic you have presented... ?
Or you could get on talking about the subject instead, which I assume you have an opinion on?
Perhaps the first post to be removed should have stayed?
It would certainly have allowed AOG to exercise his outrage at being insulted, blahdy, blahdy, blah.
I'm not sure quite what the case was all about, nor why it should appear now so long after the fact....
But based on what *has* been reported, No she shouldn't be given a flat on those facts.
It would certainly have allowed AOG to exercise his outrage at being insulted, blahdy, blahdy, blah.
I'm not sure quite what the case was all about, nor why it should appear now so long after the fact....
But based on what *has* been reported, No she shouldn't be given a flat on those facts.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.