News0 min ago
Small Claims Court
has anyone started this procedure? do you find it easy?
Answers
yeah G it has to be worf it .... not suing a man of straw was one of the early lessons at law skool [I am not a lawyer] The peak of the paper system which has gone now was very user friendly and the computer system is not so good but it is early days The case which went 'badly wrong' I had heard the clerks of the court commenting that "six into four wont go" so it was pretty...
17:53 Sat 02nd Apr 2016
and you have to start it electronically here
https:/ /www.mo neyclai m.gov.u k/web/m col/wel come
before which you hve to read this load of old carp
http:// www.jus tice.go v.uk/do wnloads /courts /mcol-q uicksta rt-guid e.pdf
and there is no escape - you have to do it like they say
but yeah - you know I have done it
and got the money I otherwise wouldnt have ....
https:/
before which you hve to read this load of old carp
http://
and there is no escape - you have to do it like they say
but yeah - you know I have done it
and got the money I otherwise wouldnt have ....
tezmans probz did it on paper twelve years ago
but now you have no choice.
and it IS quite different - paper and electronic
but I dont want to put your off
in one recent case (!) there were four registrars to hear the list and six cases so two 'had' to go down ( mine was one ) so the registrar started ossing around and delayed the case so that the absent defendant could answer because 'she obviously hadnt had the papers' when erm she obviously had. Then he made a court order that couldnt be obeyed
so when it came to be heard eight weeks later the next registrar said "no one makes an order like that " and asked to see it.... and when I handed it to him he commented 'oh' -
so it was registrar friendly and not particularly user-friendly
but that is the justice system for you innit ?
this comment by the way is not meant to put your off
other times it has been straight forward
you go in put your case and come out with an award
( and the fella possing you off comes out with a CCJ which I have to say is worth all the effort )
but now you have no choice.
and it IS quite different - paper and electronic
but I dont want to put your off
in one recent case (!) there were four registrars to hear the list and six cases so two 'had' to go down ( mine was one ) so the registrar started ossing around and delayed the case so that the absent defendant could answer because 'she obviously hadnt had the papers' when erm she obviously had. Then he made a court order that couldnt be obeyed
so when it came to be heard eight weeks later the next registrar said "no one makes an order like that " and asked to see it.... and when I handed it to him he commented 'oh' -
so it was registrar friendly and not particularly user-friendly
but that is the justice system for you innit ?
this comment by the way is not meant to put your off
other times it has been straight forward
you go in put your case and come out with an award
( and the fella possing you off comes out with a CCJ which I have to say is worth all the effort )
I once did one.
I do not remember it being difficult, but mine was 20 years ago.
Be warned, often it is spending good money after bad.
The judgement went in my favour and my costs were to be paid by the other side. Unfortunately they never paid me a penny and closed the company a few months later, opening up right away under a new name (Same people, same work, same address).
I do not remember it being difficult, but mine was 20 years ago.
Be warned, often it is spending good money after bad.
The judgement went in my favour and my costs were to be paid by the other side. Unfortunately they never paid me a penny and closed the company a few months later, opening up right away under a new name (Same people, same work, same address).
yeah G
it has to be worf it ....
not suing a man of straw was one of the early lessons at law skool
[I am not a lawyer]
The peak of the paper system which has gone now was very user friendly
and the computer system is not so good
but it is early days
The case which went 'badly wrong' I had heard the clerks of the court commenting that "six into four wont go" so it was pretty obvious he wasnt going to hear it. we were called at 11 am with 'wigs off and tiffin' at 1300 and he waved a document at me and said, 'This ISN'T a skeleton argument!' and where is the attestation and blah blah blah ?
and I felt like saying ( but didnt, I simpered and said there isnt one sir ) "look so fracking what ? it is a document to assist the court and the whole point of this court system is that it is more informal and less officious but clearly not today and clearly not with you."
well reader you can understand why I didnt say THAT
it has to be worf it ....
not suing a man of straw was one of the early lessons at law skool
[I am not a lawyer]
The peak of the paper system which has gone now was very user friendly
and the computer system is not so good
but it is early days
The case which went 'badly wrong' I had heard the clerks of the court commenting that "six into four wont go" so it was pretty obvious he wasnt going to hear it. we were called at 11 am with 'wigs off and tiffin' at 1300 and he waved a document at me and said, 'This ISN'T a skeleton argument!' and where is the attestation and blah blah blah ?
and I felt like saying ( but didnt, I simpered and said there isnt one sir ) "look so fracking what ? it is a document to assist the court and the whole point of this court system is that it is more informal and less officious but clearly not today and clearly not with you."
well reader you can understand why I didnt say THAT