69M Uninformed Horrible People....and...
News0 min ago
Will Not Witnessed
18 Answers
I'm a bit worried about an elderly aunt of mine.
We have been trying to get her to do a will which she was reluctant to do as she only has one daughter who she just assumed would just get everything.
Well she has finally done one but now we find out out it has not been signed by any witnesses.
As we know it can't be witnessed by family but she has no friends ( her and her daughter live together and don't get out much) so what can she do?
Her only contacts / visitors are family members. Would it really matter if it's not signed? I'm guessing it does.
We have been trying to get her to do a will which she was reluctant to do as she only has one daughter who she just assumed would just get everything.
Well she has finally done one but now we find out out it has not been signed by any witnesses.
As we know it can't be witnessed by family but she has no friends ( her and her daughter live together and don't get out much) so what can she do?
Her only contacts / visitors are family members. Would it really matter if it's not signed? I'm guessing it does.
Answers
1 to 18 of 18
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by silliemillie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
// Strictly speaking they should witness the actual signing of the will by the testator/rix.//
it is absolutely essential to be valid that the two witnesses are in the room and looking at the testatriz as she signs the will so that if there is a dispute they can attest (!) that they saw her sign
the witnesses then sign
recently - a little nursey ran after a medic and said you have forgotten to sign this ! in a hospital corridor - god knows why the family felt the medical and nursing staff should sign wills.
Attestation case
will held not to be valid
I mean you know the rules ....
you have to follow them
I am very hesitant to say ' o leave it the daughter will inherit ....'
it is absolutely essential to be valid that the two witnesses are in the room and looking at the testatriz as she signs the will so that if there is a dispute they can attest (!) that they saw her sign
the witnesses then sign
recently - a little nursey ran after a medic and said you have forgotten to sign this ! in a hospital corridor - god knows why the family felt the medical and nursing staff should sign wills.
Attestation case
will held not to be valid
I mean you know the rules ....
you have to follow them
I am very hesitant to say ' o leave it the daughter will inherit ....'
//she has finally done one but now we find out out it has not been signed by any witnesses.//
Then it is worthless, as anyone could have produced it and forged the signature. Witnesses are simply witnessing that they were present when the will was signed and they must provide their bona fides.
For simplicity, I think the same document could be re-signed again with witnesses.
Then it is worthless, as anyone could have produced it and forged the signature. Witnesses are simply witnessing that they were present when the will was signed and they must provide their bona fides.
For simplicity, I think the same document could be re-signed again with witnesses.
I used to run a will-writing company, so here's my input:
An unwitnessed will is simply a totally meaningless piece of paper. The will MUST be signed AND witnessed. Further, it's vital that the witnesses actually SEE the testator sign. (They don't need to see the content of the will. Indeed, they don't even know that the document is a will but they MUST be present when it's signed. They CAN'T add their signatures later).
Beneficiaries under a will MUST NOT witness it. (If they do so the will remains valid except for the parts which leave something to them). Family member who AREN'T beneficiaries CAN be witnesses.
Witnesses DON'T need to be known to the testator. My own will was witnessed, by a couple of people I happened to be working with that day, on a Tesco car park! Your aunt could (for example) get a neighbour and the postman to witness her signature.
If your aunt dies without leaving a valid will, the laws relating to intestacy will apply. That probably means that her daughter will get everything
https:/
but I'd still advise that a will should be written. (I told my own father that if, after his death, I found that he'd left everything to the cat's home I wouldn't be bothered. However if he died without leaving a will, even though I would get all of his estate under the laws of intestacy anyway, I'd be bloody annoyed because I'd have far more hassle to deal with!)
Your aunt's will doesn't need to be complex. The following would suffice:
"This is the last Will and Trestament of me, Agnes Aunt, of 42 Acacia Crescent, Sometown, in the County of Hereshire.
I appoint Norma Niece of 42 Acacia Crescent, Sometown, in the County of Hereshire and Another Relative of 23a The Grove, Othertown, in the County of Thereshire as executors of my estate.
I hereby revoke all former wills and testaments.
I leave my estate, in its entirety and wheresoever situate, to my daughter Norma Niece of 42 Acacia Crescent, Sometown, in the County of Hereshire.
In witness whereof I have here unto set my hand this twenty-third day of November two thousand and sixteen.
[Aunt's signature]
Signed by the above named testatrix Agnes Aunt as and for her last Will and Testament in the presence of us both present at the same time together who then at her request in her presence and in the presence of each other hereunto subscribed our names as witnesses
[Signatures of witnesses, with their names and addresses printed underneath]"
An unwitnessed will is simply a totally meaningless piece of paper. The will MUST be signed AND witnessed. Further, it's vital that the witnesses actually SEE the testator sign. (They don't need to see the content of the will. Indeed, they don't even know that the document is a will but they MUST be present when it's signed. They CAN'T add their signatures later).
Beneficiaries under a will MUST NOT witness it. (If they do so the will remains valid except for the parts which leave something to them). Family member who AREN'T beneficiaries CAN be witnesses.
Witnesses DON'T need to be known to the testator. My own will was witnessed, by a couple of people I happened to be working with that day, on a Tesco car park! Your aunt could (for example) get a neighbour and the postman to witness her signature.
If your aunt dies without leaving a valid will, the laws relating to intestacy will apply. That probably means that her daughter will get everything
https:/
but I'd still advise that a will should be written. (I told my own father that if, after his death, I found that he'd left everything to the cat's home I wouldn't be bothered. However if he died without leaving a will, even though I would get all of his estate under the laws of intestacy anyway, I'd be bloody annoyed because I'd have far more hassle to deal with!)
Your aunt's will doesn't need to be complex. The following would suffice:
"This is the last Will and Trestament of me, Agnes Aunt, of 42 Acacia Crescent, Sometown, in the County of Hereshire.
I appoint Norma Niece of 42 Acacia Crescent, Sometown, in the County of Hereshire and Another Relative of 23a The Grove, Othertown, in the County of Thereshire as executors of my estate.
I hereby revoke all former wills and testaments.
I leave my estate, in its entirety and wheresoever situate, to my daughter Norma Niece of 42 Acacia Crescent, Sometown, in the County of Hereshire.
In witness whereof I have here unto set my hand this twenty-third day of November two thousand and sixteen.
[Aunt's signature]
Signed by the above named testatrix Agnes Aunt as and for her last Will and Testament in the presence of us both present at the same time together who then at her request in her presence and in the presence of each other hereunto subscribed our names as witnesses
[Signatures of witnesses, with their names and addresses printed underneath]"
Because I am a picky type I thought I would just make a few observations. The law relating to the execution of wills is found in s9 Wills Act 1837. http://
It's quite an interesting read.
Silliemillie could go to see her aunt with a friend. The aunt could then acknowledge her signature in the presence of SM and said friend. SM and friend could then sign the Will (in the presence of Aunty). Will is then valid.
It is NOT necessary for witnesses to add their names and addresses. Only a signature is required. Names and addresses are just useful in case there is a challenge later.
I do not know of any cases where the age of ink has been tested. Normally the Court would rely on a "presumption of due execution". Ie, if it looks like it has been properly executed, there is a presumption that it was. I have no doubt that some Wills have slipped through the net that looked OK but were technically invalid. There are quite a few cases where the execution has been challenged and the witnesses could not be traced - the presumption will prevail though for policy reasons unless strong evidence is adduced to rebut it. See Sherrington v Sherrington for a useful exposition of this.
It's quite an interesting read.
Silliemillie could go to see her aunt with a friend. The aunt could then acknowledge her signature in the presence of SM and said friend. SM and friend could then sign the Will (in the presence of Aunty). Will is then valid.
It is NOT necessary for witnesses to add their names and addresses. Only a signature is required. Names and addresses are just useful in case there is a challenge later.
I do not know of any cases where the age of ink has been tested. Normally the Court would rely on a "presumption of due execution". Ie, if it looks like it has been properly executed, there is a presumption that it was. I have no doubt that some Wills have slipped through the net that looked OK but were technically invalid. There are quite a few cases where the execution has been challenged and the witnesses could not be traced - the presumption will prevail though for policy reasons unless strong evidence is adduced to rebut it. See Sherrington v Sherrington for a useful exposition of this.
1 to 18 of 18
