ChatterBank0 min ago
Wedding No Photos Allowed?
My wife was invited to a friend's wedding. She took a camera to take pictures, but they were told 'no photos were allowed as a professional photographer has the sole rights'
I can see the point in protecting the photographer's profit but surely it can't be legal to forbid anyone from taking a photo?
I can see the point in protecting the photographer's profit but surely it can't be legal to forbid anyone from taking a photo?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by EDDIE51. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The legalities are not quite so straightforward as although weddings are supposed to be open to the public to attend (certainly those in the Church of England must), receptions etc. are definitely not public events and almost certainly not held in venues open to the general public at the time. Being a private event the organisers can impose whatever restrictions they wish.
However, that aside, if I was invited to a wedding with such a restriction I would politely decline. I have declined a number of wedding invitations where a prescribed dress code was imposed and this would really be little different.
However, that aside, if I was invited to a wedding with such a restriction I would politely decline. I have declined a number of wedding invitations where a prescribed dress code was imposed and this would really be little different.
I have a certain sympathy with the photographer if it was his/her decision. The couple getting married want the best photographs and the professionals use their expertise to set up the best shots. It's very annoying, to set the scenes and then all the amateurs take their photo's at the experts elbow. I've also heard of occasions when the official photographer sends in proof's for selection and the Bride and Groom have rejected them in favour of the cheaper (sometimes free) copies of their friends which are virtually copies of the professional.
Maybe the couple didn't want photos uploaded to social media within seconds of them being taken.
I don't believe it was the photographer's decision although the bride may have felt more comfortable blaming him.
Perhaps she wanted her guests to enjoy the event instead of constantly looking through the camera / phone.
I don't believe it was the photographer's decision although the bride may have felt more comfortable blaming him.
Perhaps she wanted her guests to enjoy the event instead of constantly looking through the camera / phone.
I went to a wedding where I arrived to a panic, the photographer had phoned to say he had been in a car crash and could not get there.
Luckily I had a decent camera with me and did the entire wedding shoot. I didn't get paid but got free drinks all day!
I handed the films over to the couple who got them printed, they told me that my photos were as good as a pro but free, I did do some paid photography back in those days and had some photos in the national newspapers!
Luckily I had a decent camera with me and did the entire wedding shoot. I didn't get paid but got free drinks all day!
I handed the films over to the couple who got them printed, they told me that my photos were as good as a pro but free, I did do some paid photography back in those days and had some photos in the national newspapers!
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.