Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Wrongly Accused
28 Answers
I separated from my husband in December 2014 but we remained on good terms. I see him 3 or 4 times a year when I take the dog we both shared over to him for his little holiday. My husband rang me last night to say he had received a letter from his council. They had been contacted by a "third party" to inform them I still live there & the letter stated it was an offence not to tell the council of change of circumstances. He gets a reduced council tax amount as a sole occupant as I do too in the property I now live, 35 miles from him. He rang the number on the letter & was told to fill in the forms & return them. It appears they will also be writing to me as he gave them my details. They would not divulge anything on where this information came from & guess they won't tell me either. He is not unduly concerned but I find it nasty that someone has gone to lengths trying to make trouble. I have absolutely no belongings in his home.
Answers
This happened to my Daughter some years ago, just cooperate and if they want to visit either property it certainly speeded things up to let them as it did in her case. Some folk are vindictive aren't they.
21:14 Sat 07th Oct 2017
Your post doesn't actually ask us to provide any specific information or advice, so I'm not entirely sure how to respond to it.
However if the council officials send their letter to your current address (rather to your husband's one), and you then to respond to it, they've automatically got some proof of where you're currently living.
I suggest filling in any form(s) they ask you to complete but also sending a covering letter, stating:
(a) when you moved out of your former shared home ;
(b) when you moved to your current address (if different) ;
(c) that you've not co-habited with your husband since the above date(s) ;
(d) that you're registerd on the electoral roll at your current address ;
(e) that you pay Council Tax to Blogsborough District Council (quoting the reference number on your Council Tax forms, if possible) ; and
(f) that you're willing to provide any additional evidence as proof of your current address (such as utility bills) upon request.
That should hopefully convince them that they're not only barking up the wrong tree but in the wrong forest.
However if the council officials send their letter to your current address (rather to your husband's one), and you then to respond to it, they've automatically got some proof of where you're currently living.
I suggest filling in any form(s) they ask you to complete but also sending a covering letter, stating:
(a) when you moved out of your former shared home ;
(b) when you moved to your current address (if different) ;
(c) that you've not co-habited with your husband since the above date(s) ;
(d) that you're registerd on the electoral roll at your current address ;
(e) that you pay Council Tax to Blogsborough District Council (quoting the reference number on your Council Tax forms, if possible) ; and
(f) that you're willing to provide any additional evidence as proof of your current address (such as utility bills) upon request.
That should hopefully convince them that they're not only barking up the wrong tree but in the wrong forest.
// Your post doesn't actually ask us to provide any specific information or advice, so I'm not entirely sure how to respond to it. //
oh god I do
there is a document on proof of residence that I dug out a few weeks ago and if I find it again I will repost it
I am surprised that they rang your husband and didnt arrange a meeting
at this meeting they read out the letter
and ask ( him) to comment - take notes etc
I am not sure if they caution the lucky suspect
then they sort of wait and discuss it themselves and push the papers around and about
The nub of the document is that allegations of co-residence can be adequately rebutted by showing that they live elsewhere by
post - addressed envelopes
electoral roll
utility bills
I would supply examples to your husband
and he should send them onto the investigating council rather than wait for them to inquire
and wait
he should be able to get a copy of the text of the allegation as he is mentioned on it and no one else and so it is his data - he needs to make a subject access request to the council that has received the complaint (if he wants)
I had this with a tenant and her luffer - and we thought the complainant was the tenants mother who didnt like the look of her future son in law -
oh god I do
there is a document on proof of residence that I dug out a few weeks ago and if I find it again I will repost it
I am surprised that they rang your husband and didnt arrange a meeting
at this meeting they read out the letter
and ask ( him) to comment - take notes etc
I am not sure if they caution the lucky suspect
then they sort of wait and discuss it themselves and push the papers around and about
The nub of the document is that allegations of co-residence can be adequately rebutted by showing that they live elsewhere by
post - addressed envelopes
electoral roll
utility bills
I would supply examples to your husband
and he should send them onto the investigating council rather than wait for them to inquire
and wait
he should be able to get a copy of the text of the allegation as he is mentioned on it and no one else and so it is his data - he needs to make a subject access request to the council that has received the complaint (if he wants)
I had this with a tenant and her luffer - and we thought the complainant was the tenants mother who didnt like the look of her future son in law -
PETER PENDANT. You read my post wrong. They did not ring my husband...they wrote to him & he rang the number on the letter regarding this. He's now filled in the required documents & returned them to his local authority. BEST ADVICE. The letter stated they had been contacted by a "third party" so I don't think they were just randomly checking. BHG481 so you are saying I cannot visit my husband? I take the dog there & stay less than an hour. My car is on his drive for this time & a similar time when I go to collect the dog to bring him home with me
thelewisgang - no, I am not saying that. I am merely pointing out that someone may have genuinely thought that you were cheating the system and reported you. That is something I have never done but I would if the situation arose. There is only so much money available for needy cases and I'm sure you would agree that money should not be given to cheats at the expense of genuine cases.