OH decided to appeal a PIP award. At the Tribunal the Chairperson suggested she could be worse off if she continued to proceed. OH couldn't understand, because she thought she had a strong claim for a higher award, so she agreed to the Chair's suggestion to adjourn.
OH could only think that the Tribunal were mistaken in the period of time she was under a disability - in other words that she had not met the minimum period of disablement.
At the adjourned Tribunal, there was another worrying moment about the period of disablement and it was suggested she took a few minutes to consider whether to continue. She did, again because she thought her case was sound and that the Tribunal had misunderstood the period of disablement.
Upshot was that she won her case and was awarded the enhanced amount of PIP. As said above, the members of the Tribunal were understanding and respectful, though it was unfortunate that they seemed to have missed the point about the period of her disability. The important thing is to be totally honest about the circumstances of the disability and how it impacts on the various factors in the DWP checklist.