ChatterBank2 mins ago
Food Allergy Notice
Could a shop/eatery legally display a sign stating that none of their food or drinks can be guaranteed allergy free?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by hc4361. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// Could a shop/eatery legally display a sign stating that none of their food or drinks can be guaranteed allergy free? //
um I know this is law and this q is hypothetical - so a turn off for most people ......
I suppose they could legally display a sign telling their customers to frack off - or that the shop is closed when it is open.... BUT
would such a sign relieve them of all liability in the event of a death?
Not sure - see a lawyer - it is a condition before a contract so should be counted at common law BUT may fall foul of the Unfair Contract Clauses act 1977
and as mystic meg might say - - - or it might not....
I dont think you can contractually exclude negligence
so if a shop shows such a sign - and the shop assistant negligently says - yeah normally but this one is allergen free
then you might still have a case.
Since this is hypothetical - what about a proper one
"A buys an allergen-full peanut butty knowing his wife is allergic and gives it to her, lying it is safe with intent to kill or maim her. But it doesnt do diddly squat. What is his criminal liability and what is the sellers civil liability?"
um I know this is law and this q is hypothetical - so a turn off for most people ......
I suppose they could legally display a sign telling their customers to frack off - or that the shop is closed when it is open.... BUT
would such a sign relieve them of all liability in the event of a death?
Not sure - see a lawyer - it is a condition before a contract so should be counted at common law BUT may fall foul of the Unfair Contract Clauses act 1977
and as mystic meg might say - - - or it might not....
I dont think you can contractually exclude negligence
so if a shop shows such a sign - and the shop assistant negligently says - yeah normally but this one is allergen free
then you might still have a case.
Since this is hypothetical - what about a proper one
"A buys an allergen-full peanut butty knowing his wife is allergic and gives it to her, lying it is safe with intent to kill or maim her. But it doesnt do diddly squat. What is his criminal liability and what is the sellers civil liability?"
BTW, a notice stating that there can be no guarantee that foods are allergen free wouldn't (on its own) be sufficient where foods are sold. Information must be available to customers about the specific allergens which are in each product.
So, in a small business (such as a burger van) a notice saying "Please ask for information about allergens in the food sold here" would be sufficient as long the person running the van could verbally provide accurate information.
A larger business (with many staff, some of whom might be only partly-trained) might find that having printed lists of allergens in each product would be a safer way of meeting their statutory obligations.
So, in a small business (such as a burger van) a notice saying "Please ask for information about allergens in the food sold here" would be sufficient as long the person running the van could verbally provide accurate information.
A larger business (with many staff, some of whom might be only partly-trained) might find that having printed lists of allergens in each product would be a safer way of meeting their statutory obligations.
PP: If food is prepared on-site there's currently no obligation upon the business to display a list of allergens on product packaging (if any is used). That's why Pret weren't obliged to label their pre-packed (but store made) sandwiches in the recently-reported case where a teenager died. However:
(a) the business must still be able to provide details of allergens present in their products upon request (and should make it clear that this facility exists) ;
(b) the Government has indicated that the law will be changed to force such retailers to show details of allergens on pre-packed store-made products ; and
(c) Pret has voluntarily adopted the new approach anyway.
(a) the business must still be able to provide details of allergens present in their products upon request (and should make it clear that this facility exists) ;
(b) the Government has indicated that the law will be changed to force such retailers to show details of allergens on pre-packed store-made products ; and
(c) Pret has voluntarily adopted the new approach anyway.
I dunno I am not sure they can but as a person who is allergic we kind of already know what we are allergic to so we usually avoid foods that can cause a reaction. I have been allergic to peanuts for example since I was 8 years old and I have always avoided it in the shops. Even trace amounts of peanuts can cause an anaphylactic reaction in me. When I first got an allergic reaction I went to the hospital with my mom. They treated the immediate symptoms and then sent me to a pediatric allergist. He prescribed a set of tests to figure out what else was I allergic to. We went to a private lab that tested me (if you guys need to get tested you can check them here: https:/ /www.in toleran celab.c o.uk/in toleran ce-2). In about a week I knew all the allergens I had a reaction to and it helped me have a safer life. I have been okay for the past few decades, so I feel like for anyone who's allergic to be aware of their condition and to just be careful.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.