News1 min ago
Can I Get Sacked For Losing Company Cheques
What happens was back in July my manager gave me two cheques to bank over the weekend from the comfort fund (money given to us by resident's relatives as a thank you). I copied these and put in the tin as this is the usual procedure, Anyway I couldn't get to the bank over the weekend because my son was sick so I left them in my bag and totally forgot about them until recently my colleague was balancing the comfort fund money and found the copies of these cheques and couldn't trace them. She asked me about them and this is when I remembered them so I pulled out everything in my bag and the cheques had gone.
Answers
1 to 4 of 4
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Nay37. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The law doesn't prevent an employer from sacking any employee, at any time, with any length of service, with or without a valid reason. All it does is give some people who've been sacked the right to claim for 'unfair dismissal'. (Even if they're successful in their claim the employer doesn't have to take them back on again; they can simply pay compensation instead).
So nobody can guarantee that your employer won't sack you; we can only advise upon whether you'd have a reasonable claim for 'unfair dismissal' if it actually occurred. (That, of course, is something which an employer will also have in mind if he/she is considering dismissing an employee from their service).
The first thing to make clear is that the right to claim for 'unfair dismissal' only starts once you've been in the employment for two years. If you've worked for your employer for less than that time he/she can fire you without the need for any reason for doing so. (There are certain exceptions, relating to 'statutory discrimination', but they're not relevant here).
Once you've been in employment for two years an employer can only dismiss you (without facing a possible claim for 'unfair dismissal') over a single, isolated incident if that incident constitutes 'gross misconduct'. (Once again there are certain exceptions to that statement but, again, they're not relevant here).
It's now that we enter the grey area as to what does, or does not, constitute 'gross misconduct'. In some cases an employer will advise employees in advance of certain actions that will be regarded as 'gross misconduct'. (e.g. a delivery driver might be told that it will be deemed 'gross misconduct' if he/she leaves their van unlocked, with the keys in the ignition, while making a delivery). In general though the employer has to decide after an incident has occurred as to whether, or not, it counts as 'gross misconduct'. (If the employer decides that it is, and the employee goes to an Employment Tribunal claiming 'unfair dismissal', the Tribunal will then have to give their own ruling on the matter).
Clearly, if you'd sought to pay the cheques into your own bank account (or otherwise sought to profit from having them in your possession) your employer would have no problem in deciding that your actions constituted 'gross misconduct'. Similarly, if you'd failed to follow the correct procedure (with regard to keeping copies of the cheques) it might also be regarded as 'gross misconduct'. However it's less likely that a simple omission, as has occurred in your case, could be seen as 'gross misconduct'. (That assumes that putting the cheques into your bag, to bank later, was the approved procedure; it might not apply if, say, you were told to leave cheques on the premises if they couldn't be banked immediately).
While a decision about what is, or isn't, 'gross misconduct' ought to be based upon the facts alone, the reality is that other factors often come into play. So, if an employer has been itching to find a reason to get rid of an employee that they'd rather not keep on, they'll quickly classify certain behaviour as 'gross misconduct', whereas if they really value the contributions of a member of staff they'll decide that such behaviour doesn't fall under 'gross misconduct'.
So there can be no 'black and white' answer to your question. My own feeling though is that an Employment Tribunal wouldn't regard a single omission to act (i.e. to bank the cheques) as 'gross misconduct'. If your employer agrees they won't sack you (unless they're prepared to have the matter taken before a Tribunal). If they disagree, and do sack you, you might come out the winner in a claim for 'unfair dismissal'. (At one time you had to pay to take a claim for 'unfair dismissal' before a Tribunal but the Supreme Court has now ruled such fees to be unlawful).
So nobody can guarantee that your employer won't sack you; we can only advise upon whether you'd have a reasonable claim for 'unfair dismissal' if it actually occurred. (That, of course, is something which an employer will also have in mind if he/she is considering dismissing an employee from their service).
The first thing to make clear is that the right to claim for 'unfair dismissal' only starts once you've been in the employment for two years. If you've worked for your employer for less than that time he/she can fire you without the need for any reason for doing so. (There are certain exceptions, relating to 'statutory discrimination', but they're not relevant here).
Once you've been in employment for two years an employer can only dismiss you (without facing a possible claim for 'unfair dismissal') over a single, isolated incident if that incident constitutes 'gross misconduct'. (Once again there are certain exceptions to that statement but, again, they're not relevant here).
It's now that we enter the grey area as to what does, or does not, constitute 'gross misconduct'. In some cases an employer will advise employees in advance of certain actions that will be regarded as 'gross misconduct'. (e.g. a delivery driver might be told that it will be deemed 'gross misconduct' if he/she leaves their van unlocked, with the keys in the ignition, while making a delivery). In general though the employer has to decide after an incident has occurred as to whether, or not, it counts as 'gross misconduct'. (If the employer decides that it is, and the employee goes to an Employment Tribunal claiming 'unfair dismissal', the Tribunal will then have to give their own ruling on the matter).
Clearly, if you'd sought to pay the cheques into your own bank account (or otherwise sought to profit from having them in your possession) your employer would have no problem in deciding that your actions constituted 'gross misconduct'. Similarly, if you'd failed to follow the correct procedure (with regard to keeping copies of the cheques) it might also be regarded as 'gross misconduct'. However it's less likely that a simple omission, as has occurred in your case, could be seen as 'gross misconduct'. (That assumes that putting the cheques into your bag, to bank later, was the approved procedure; it might not apply if, say, you were told to leave cheques on the premises if they couldn't be banked immediately).
While a decision about what is, or isn't, 'gross misconduct' ought to be based upon the facts alone, the reality is that other factors often come into play. So, if an employer has been itching to find a reason to get rid of an employee that they'd rather not keep on, they'll quickly classify certain behaviour as 'gross misconduct', whereas if they really value the contributions of a member of staff they'll decide that such behaviour doesn't fall under 'gross misconduct'.
So there can be no 'black and white' answer to your question. My own feeling though is that an Employment Tribunal wouldn't regard a single omission to act (i.e. to bank the cheques) as 'gross misconduct'. If your employer agrees they won't sack you (unless they're prepared to have the matter taken before a Tribunal). If they disagree, and do sack you, you might come out the winner in a claim for 'unfair dismissal'. (At one time you had to pay to take a claim for 'unfair dismissal' before a Tribunal but the Supreme Court has now ruled such fees to be unlawful).
chris has given an exhaustive analysis
beginning from what I would regard as an odd point of view
First of all begin with your contract of employment
and whether they have a disciplinary code and what the details are
think about gross misconduct
and this is useful
https:/
consider where you are in this
I think the investigation is just beginning
I think you can adequately refute dishonesty - they were recorded but not paid in
I think your employer can ( but oyu cant ) contact the originators and see if they have been cashed and who by
I mean they can get away with it by saying we have lost the cheques ( which is true)
If someone else has got the moolah clearly we are talking about something else
oh and make notes about all that has happened which you keep to yourself but use to answer any questions in the future
and wait - oh and join a union
beginning from what I would regard as an odd point of view
First of all begin with your contract of employment
and whether they have a disciplinary code and what the details are
think about gross misconduct
and this is useful
https:/
consider where you are in this
I think the investigation is just beginning
I think you can adequately refute dishonesty - they were recorded but not paid in
I think your employer can ( but oyu cant ) contact the originators and see if they have been cashed and who by
I mean they can get away with it by saying we have lost the cheques ( which is true)
If someone else has got the moolah clearly we are talking about something else
oh and make notes about all that has happened which you keep to yourself but use to answer any questions in the future
and wait - oh and join a union
and yeah this kinda happened to me
I afterward refused to handle any money
A benefactor gave a cheque to my employer in relation to sick liddle children where I happend to run a charity. I was informed by miss X but had no further information. ( so did nothing )
Later ( eight weeks ) the benefactress rang the Hospital and was put thro to Miss X. and Miss X (bless!) could give no information. Miss X later contacted me and asked what had happened to the cheque and where was it.
I searched and searched and cdnt find the damn thing (£50) and I cdnt remember the payee.or the payer. And Miss X was piling in and 'helping' and told me that my employer took a very serious view indeed of all this.... very serious and her voice went quiet
and I just about had a melt-down. and then God intervened. I said to miss X that I didnt recollect transfer to me ( and she kinda went 'oh yeaaaah!' ) and could she cheque her safe ? triggered perhaps that I had not record of reception and SHE had no record of transfer.
and as we looked together - there was the cheque at the very bottom item of her safe where it had been for eight weeks
I said - taking the cheque: "you have told my employer I have negligently misplaced a cheque or perhaps cashed it when it was in your possession all along in a place you could have easily checked"
and jesus I cdnt believe it. Yabbity yabbity yab blah blah blah. Imputing dishonesty in someone else was completely different to having fault ascribed to oneself. yap yap yap it seemed to go on forever - never her fault of course
so good luck
I have an inkling of the pressure and stress you are going thro
I afterward refused to handle any money
A benefactor gave a cheque to my employer in relation to sick liddle children where I happend to run a charity. I was informed by miss X but had no further information. ( so did nothing )
Later ( eight weeks ) the benefactress rang the Hospital and was put thro to Miss X. and Miss X (bless!) could give no information. Miss X later contacted me and asked what had happened to the cheque and where was it.
I searched and searched and cdnt find the damn thing (£50) and I cdnt remember the payee.or the payer. And Miss X was piling in and 'helping' and told me that my employer took a very serious view indeed of all this.... very serious and her voice went quiet
and I just about had a melt-down. and then God intervened. I said to miss X that I didnt recollect transfer to me ( and she kinda went 'oh yeaaaah!' ) and could she cheque her safe ? triggered perhaps that I had not record of reception and SHE had no record of transfer.
and as we looked together - there was the cheque at the very bottom item of her safe where it had been for eight weeks
I said - taking the cheque: "you have told my employer I have negligently misplaced a cheque or perhaps cashed it when it was in your possession all along in a place you could have easily checked"
and jesus I cdnt believe it. Yabbity yabbity yab blah blah blah. Imputing dishonesty in someone else was completely different to having fault ascribed to oneself. yap yap yap it seemed to go on forever - never her fault of course
so good luck
I have an inkling of the pressure and stress you are going thro
1 to 4 of 4
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.