ChatterBank2 mins ago
Sinnfein Mps Paid?
Are Sinn Fein Mps paid? I heard that the members of Stormont are paid, even though they've not done a day's work for three years.
Answers
They get expenses only: https:// fullfact. org/ news/ sinn- fein- salaries/
13:23 Fri 20th Dec 2019
They get expenses only:
https:/ /fullfa ct.org/ news/si nn-fein -salari es/
https:/
No, they only get expenses.
https:/ /fullfa ct.org/ news/si nn-fein -salari es/
https:/
they wont take the oath ( of allegiance) nor affirm (allegiance)
they wont do this as it shows 'surrender' - er a bit nineteenth century if you ask me but jacob Rees Mogg is stuck in the eighteenth so there you are
now 1870-1900, a few MPs refused to swear on religious grounds (such as they wouldnt wish to be associated with the adulterers perjurers and liars who did) - and were chucked out !
I think the courts go involved on the grounds that proceedings in the House were not reviewable but this was not a proceeding but an expulsion
(where have you recently heard THAT argument)
blah de blah more words - more illogic worse even readers than the rubbish you read on a daily basis on dear old AB
Gladstone comes out badly - leave to a vote in the commons and they refect for a third time
someone comes up with - a by election is unlawful as there is no vacancy altho the commons has declared there is, because it cant do something like that
AND SO
when the sinn feiners came up with this little wheeze - - they were ready for them (!) and they said that they were elected and they had constituents business to pursue at an official level. so going back to their bog or pub in oireland and sulking ( said the Brit civil servants) were not in their voters interests, and would they co operate ?
you will note that the gentleman in a morning suit in Whitehall seemed to care for a few tow haired irish sorry oirish farmers shepherd and smugglers than their so called representatives did.
so a compromised was hammered out where they show their doo-dahs and are allowed in and can write commons letters and blah de blah
and the rest is history - see above
And if you questions was - I dont think Irish MPs should be paid do you? then why not come out with it
they wont do this as it shows 'surrender' - er a bit nineteenth century if you ask me but jacob Rees Mogg is stuck in the eighteenth so there you are
now 1870-1900, a few MPs refused to swear on religious grounds (such as they wouldnt wish to be associated with the adulterers perjurers and liars who did) - and were chucked out !
I think the courts go involved on the grounds that proceedings in the House were not reviewable but this was not a proceeding but an expulsion
(where have you recently heard THAT argument)
blah de blah more words - more illogic worse even readers than the rubbish you read on a daily basis on dear old AB
Gladstone comes out badly - leave to a vote in the commons and they refect for a third time
someone comes up with - a by election is unlawful as there is no vacancy altho the commons has declared there is, because it cant do something like that
AND SO
when the sinn feiners came up with this little wheeze - - they were ready for them (!) and they said that they were elected and they had constituents business to pursue at an official level. so going back to their bog or pub in oireland and sulking ( said the Brit civil servants) were not in their voters interests, and would they co operate ?
you will note that the gentleman in a morning suit in Whitehall seemed to care for a few tow haired irish sorry oirish farmers shepherd and smugglers than their so called representatives did.
so a compromised was hammered out where they show their doo-dahs and are allowed in and can write commons letters and blah de blah
and the rest is history - see above
And if you questions was - I dont think Irish MPs should be paid do you? then why not come out with it
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.