News2 mins ago
Should Second Offenders Get Another Second Chance ?
There is a very strong case for saying an unequivocal and resounding NO.
The criminal Alex Lanning in this case was released halfway through his first custodial sentence and then went out and murdered an innocent victim.
Now he's got 25 years (not nearly enough anyway) and I bet the Parole pansies will let him out again well before then. This should never ever be allowed for second offenders in my opinion.
If you screw up your second chance, that should screw you up from ever getting another.
The number of times I read of magistrates/judges giving convicts yet another "last chance" appalls me.
When are we going to get a Government which really is tough on Law - on past showing Labour are unlikely to be any better (cue for TTT to claim they would be worse).
[end of rant]
https:/
The criminal Alex Lanning in this case was released halfway through his first custodial sentence and then went out and murdered an innocent victim.
Now he's got 25 years (not nearly enough anyway) and I bet the Parole pansies will let him out again well before then. This should never ever be allowed for second offenders in my opinion.
If you screw up your second chance, that should screw you up from ever getting another.
The number of times I read of magistrates/judges giving convicts yet another "last chance" appalls me.
When are we going to get a Government which really is tough on Law - on past showing Labour are unlikely to be any better (cue for TTT to claim they would be worse).
[end of rant]
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//Reoffending or recidivism is key to the operation of the repetitive cycle of incarceration, re-entry, re-offending and re-incarceration, and represents a major policy challenge. In the UK, 75% of ex-inmates reoffend within nine years of release, and 39.3% within the first twelve months.//
The biggest problem is that prison only works for a small minority. Those that have reoffended are not going to be any better once they leave. So we either need much longer sentences for second (or more) offences... I can't think of an effective alternative though.
The biggest problem is that prison only works for a small minority. Those that have reoffended are not going to be any better once they leave. So we either need much longer sentences for second (or more) offences... I can't think of an effective alternative though.
// The number of times I read of magistrates/judges giving convicts yet another "last chance" appalls me.//
that would be because you are so appalled that you dont read on and find out just how lousy prison is at preventing reoffending
60% go back to nick
75% think the future facing little smow - never have a job
if ther was a covid vaccine that worked in less than 40% of cases you would say it wouldnt work(*). In the same analysis - prison doesnt work
(*) yeah cries from a 100 ABers - "why he say covid
den?"
anyway you mean a third chance dont you?
that would be because you are so appalled that you dont read on and find out just how lousy prison is at preventing reoffending
60% go back to nick
75% think the future facing little smow - never have a job
if ther was a covid vaccine that worked in less than 40% of cases you would say it wouldnt work(*). In the same analysis - prison doesnt work
(*) yeah cries from a 100 ABers - "why he say covid
den?"
anyway you mean a third chance dont you?
yes the chair is correct
the Home Sec used to send or not to the parole board as it occurred
this was found correctly to be an elected politician exercising judicial powers
[well so what if you look at Trump]
and was changed to the Judge at the time of sentencing
you will notice it radically changes the system ( a prison works effect cannot then be taken into account)
the Home Sec used to send or not to the parole board as it occurred
this was found correctly to be an elected politician exercising judicial powers
[well so what if you look at Trump]
and was changed to the Judge at the time of sentencing
you will notice it radically changes the system ( a prison works effect cannot then be taken into account)
Wouldn't judges alter their sentencing accordingly if full prison terms were to be served? As it presently stands, judges are aware that if they give a scrote 5 years nick, said scrote will serve 2.5, which is maybe what the judge deems a worthy punishment. If that judge wanted the scrote to serve 5 years, he would have sentenced him/her to 10 years. So, ff to a new system, and instead of handing out a 5 year sentence same judge would just send the scrote down for 2.5 years.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.