Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Illegal Eagles.....or Not?
16 Answers
I have tickets to see the Illegal Eagles and was looking forward to it. But this afternoon I received an email from the Theatre to say they will be appearing without their orchestra, due to current Covid restrictions.
In the Theatre's small print it states that tickets will not be refunded unless a show has been cancelled. I don't really want to go without the orchestra. Any thoughts about the chances of getting a refund please? I've tried to ring the Box Office without success so far.
In the Theatre's small print it states that tickets will not be refunded unless a show has been cancelled. I don't really want to go without the orchestra. Any thoughts about the chances of getting a refund please? I've tried to ring the Box Office without success so far.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by windywillow. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm fairly sure that NJ is correct (which, given the nature of his occupation, he ought to be anyway!).
However I'm wondering whether a skilled barrister might argue that it was an implied term of your contract with the theatre that the band would be supported by an orchestra (especially if such accompaniment was mentioned in their advertising for the show)?
If so, that barrister might then direct the court's attention to para 11, Schedule 1 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 which states that "a term which has the object or effect of enabling the trader to alter the terms of the contract unilaterally without a valid reason which is specified in the contract" may be regarded as unfair.
Then, unless the theatre's small print specifies a valid form of reason for altering the contract (which embraces the absence of a supporting orchestra), it might be argued that they have broken the terms of the contract.
However, despite of the foregoing, I still feel that our imaginary barrister might be clutching at straws a bit!
However I'm wondering whether a skilled barrister might argue that it was an implied term of your contract with the theatre that the band would be supported by an orchestra (especially if such accompaniment was mentioned in their advertising for the show)?
If so, that barrister might then direct the court's attention to para 11, Schedule 1 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 which states that "a term which has the object or effect of enabling the trader to alter the terms of the contract unilaterally without a valid reason which is specified in the contract" may be regarded as unfair.
Then, unless the theatre's small print specifies a valid form of reason for altering the contract (which embraces the absence of a supporting orchestra), it might be argued that they have broken the terms of the contract.
However, despite of the foregoing, I still feel that our imaginary barrister might be clutching at straws a bit!