LOL.....barry please bear with an old man who's response is about to be a reply from Andy-Hughes without the eloquence that we have come to expect.
I qualified in 1959 and have spent every day of my life engrossed in and appreciating the study of Medicine and Surgery and although that sounds rather sugary, I do not apologise. During my time I have watched my interest and hobby turn from an art into a science, which is a good thing for the patient but hard for my generation of doctors to take. Instead of MRI scans, endoscopies, estimation of blood analysis, I had heroes who with their personality, charisma and use of their five senses would come to a diagnosis. Speaking to a patient, listening to them and making a diagnosis before a hand was laid upon them was poetry to my sense of appreciation.
Now to your question barry.
Dr Google has become a valuable tool to those who know what they are talking about and thirst for further knowledge, many patients who have a diagnosed condition will know as much if not more about their condition than the doctor.
Dr Google cannot give an opinion.
It would depend upon how a patient approached the consultation with advice pre-suggested by Dr Google.
If he/she came with a degree of humility and uneasiness then I would accept the input of the Internet.
However, if I was presented with a confrontational attitude then it would put my back up and I may (depending upon my mood at the time) react in an unhelpful way that only opinionated doctors can produce.
I recognise that is and always has been a part of my character which I regret.
So yes barry the Dr Google approach has a lot to offer, but I will never react favourably to those bloody links and websites that has desecrated and prostituted a profession that |I love and has given me a lifestyle of which has fulfilled my lifetime expectations.