If the grouse is about money transfer
and the bank has invoked money laundering suspicions
then this case Shah v Midland
hhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/31.html
is a good read
Mr Shah said do this and do that
Midland didnt, and then said - gottle of geer: gottle of geer, money laundering
( they arent allowed to say anything ( = tipping off) and gottle of geer, your lips dont move)
and is the leading case still for
suspicion of money laundering = anything which is not fanciful
very very low that is!
there are just some things you dont joke over or even whisper, or - - think about. They may be telepaths
( bombs at airports, terrorism at police stations, and drug cartels in banks)
I was asked if a drug dealer owed me rent - - ding ding!
Did you spot that? it is a question about money laundering - using drug money to pay rent is obviously conversion
Shah loses