If You Had A Twin, But Didn't Realise...
Family Life1 min ago
....according to Nick Freeman (aka Mr Loophole)
https:/
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There is no fraud involved.
Enforcement Agencies (EAs) are free to offer fixed penalties when they believe offences have been committed. Those receiving those offers are equally free to ignore them after which the EA's only option is to prosecute the matter through the Magistrates' Court. There, the usual criminal procedure rules and rules of evidence will govern the proceedings and the EA will have to comply with them.
As far as the actual issue goes (i.e. is urine "litter"?) I don't fancy their chances. Nowhere in the Environmental Protection Act is urine mentioned. DEFRA's guidance on littering also does not mention it. I have never heard of anybody taken to court under the EPA for urinating being convicted. I think Tora's definition is actually a very good one for determining what litter is.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.