Does Anyone Remember Hans + Lotte Hass..
ChatterBank0 min ago
Not sure if I have posted this in the right section but here goes. . . .
I am currently in the process of selling my semi-detached house,but my solicitor has hit a problem regarding my garden,on the land search the bottom section of my garden is included as being registered to my property.All the gardens in the street end at the same point & back on to gardens from the street behind(i.e no path or road at back).
My solicitor has written to the Land Registry to request that as I have occupied this piece of land in question & no-one has disputed this that they amend the plans to include this land.That was over 2 weeks ago now and we are still waiting for a reply.
Has anyone else had any experience of this type of problem?Are they likely to amend the plans & what are the implications if they do'nt?
I am worried about the sale breaking down due to this,then there is the costs involved.
Would be grateful for any help as this is really getiing me down,thanks!!
No best answer has yet been selected by bex401. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Thanks Chris,but unfortunately I have only been in this house for 3 years,thus the problem.When I bought the house this piece of land was not questioned & therefore not resolved,if it had I would'nt be as stressed as I am now!!
My solicitor said that if the Land Registry do not agree to add it to the plans,then I will have to pay for an indemnity(?) on it,which may affect my buyers mortgage.This will obviously cause fresh problems & could loose me the sale & subsequent purchase of my new home,resulting in lots of solicitors fees.Is this correct??
Thanks Golden Shred,it is a small piece of land,as I mentioned,just the bottom of my garden.So fingers crossed they will just add it on to the plans. No news yet,but I've heard they are rather slow!!
I did'nt realise the fencing off was an option,maybe that would be less complicated than the indemnity option??