ChatterBank1 min ago
Wills
1 Answers
My brother in law is executor to his mothers Will. She has now passed away. He is not a beneficiary as he received a large amount of money from her two years ago and she wrote her Will stating that her other 3 children be beneficiaries.
He is now requesting that a 'Deed of Variation' be added to the Will so that in the event of someone receiving compensation from the hospital he will get a share.
He has done a number of things to the family in the past which has caused a great deal of upset and at least one of the beneficiaries does not wish to add this to the Will.
Should the other two beneficiaries wish to add this to the Will, what would be the implications?
Also, he is stating that he would contest the decision not to add 'Deed of Variation'. As he's the executor it's now becoming a horribly frustrating position.
Can anyone please advise?
He is now requesting that a 'Deed of Variation' be added to the Will so that in the event of someone receiving compensation from the hospital he will get a share.
He has done a number of things to the family in the past which has caused a great deal of upset and at least one of the beneficiaries does not wish to add this to the Will.
Should the other two beneficiaries wish to add this to the Will, what would be the implications?
Also, he is stating that he would contest the decision not to add 'Deed of Variation'. As he's the executor it's now becoming a horribly frustrating position.
Can anyone please advise?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Julietf123. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If all the beneficiaries are of full age and capacity, they can reach whatever decision they wish on doing a DoV to add the exec as a beneficiary. There is nothing to stop the two who wish to include him varying THEIR shares so that the two shares are split three ways (ie so he takes a share from their inheritance only). However, if the third objects, he cannot "contest" the decision. He can only contest the will on the basis that for some reason it is invalid. If he has "proved" the Will (ie obtained probate), this will prove extremely difficult for him since he will have sworn an oath to say it was the last valid will of the deceased.
In terms of compensation from the hospital, he as the executor has the duty to pursue this claim. However, if he refuses, it is possible to either have him replaced as an executor or for the beneficiaries to run the claim themselves. As an executor he is in a position of trust to act for the benefit of the estate and not for himself and it is settled law that unless the will provides otherwise, an executor should not benefit personally from his office. However, this latter point depends on to whom the compensation is paid. Depending on the type of case it is, it could be paid to the family of the deceased or to the estate (for instance, a claim for the loss of a parent in difficult circumstances could mean he has a personal claim on the other hand, a claim that the deceased suffered would be paid to the estate).
In terms of compensation from the hospital, he as the executor has the duty to pursue this claim. However, if he refuses, it is possible to either have him replaced as an executor or for the beneficiaries to run the claim themselves. As an executor he is in a position of trust to act for the benefit of the estate and not for himself and it is settled law that unless the will provides otherwise, an executor should not benefit personally from his office. However, this latter point depends on to whom the compensation is paid. Depending on the type of case it is, it could be paid to the family of the deceased or to the estate (for instance, a claim for the loss of a parent in difficult circumstances could mean he has a personal claim on the other hand, a claim that the deceased suffered would be paid to the estate).