If I�m right, newmember we had extensive discourse about this when the substantive matter to which you refer was in progress. I think I advised then that it was most unlikely that you would be convicted and was pleased to hear that you were not.
However, what you now tell us is very disturbing. If I understand it, on the basis of an unsubstantiated complaint made against you, you are now prevented for life from obtaining employment of your choosing. No matter that a court of law saw insufficient evidence to convict you of any offence: because a complaint was made, it sticks.
I find this bloody outrageous to say the least. I am surprised, but then, when I think about it and the way this country operates today, not so much so. After all, if fingerprints and DNA samples can be taken and retained from people who are not guilty of any crime, I don�t think there�s much chance that some scurrilous records held about one�s behaviour could be ordered for destruction.
But enough of my outrage, what is to be done?
I really don�t know. Since this is an officer of the government (the Chief Constable) who is the cause of this state of affairs there could be an argument under Human Rights Law, but I really don�t know under which article. The only thing that bothers me about your description of events is when you say �I admitted the incident had taken place, but not as alleged.
I�m not too au fait with the way in which these CRB records are compiled and what they are supposed to mean and I really cannot offer any advice. I think I said earlier that I would not want to be part of any profession that treats its practitioners so shabbily and I may be inclined to get out. But that�s not really the answer.
I think you need to seek professional advice.