The six years dates from the last contact with the lender - so if he has asked for his money at regular intervals during that time then you are obliged to pay up I'm afraid.
I agree with Ethel - if cresponi has moved and not informed the lender s32(1)(b) (I think) Limitation Act means that the 6 year rule will not apply.
Also, it depends on what sort of debt it is - if it is a cumulative debt which has kept accrueing (as in the old type assumptit cases) limitation may not apply in any event.
May be worth taking legal advice - the test is not "contact" with the creditor, the test is "acknowledgement" of the debt.
If you dispute the demand in whole or in part you should:
� contact the individual (or one of the individuals) named in part B immediately
If you consider that you have grounds to have this demand set aside or if you do not quickly receive a satisfactory written reply from the individual named in part B whom you have contacted you should apply within 18 days from the date of service of this demand on you to the appropriate court shown in part A to have the demand set aside.
Any application to set aside the demand (Form 6.4 in Schedule 4 to the Insolvency Rules 1986) should be made within 18 days from the date of service upon you and be supported by an affidavit (Form 6.5 in Schedule 4 to those Rules) stating the grounds on which the demand should
be set aside. The forms may be obtained from the appropriate court when you attend to make the application.
Remember! � From the date of service on you of this document
(a) you have only 18 days to apply to the court to have the demand set aside, and
(b) you have only 21 days before the creditor may present a bankruptcy petition
If you have not acknowledged this debt or paid anything off it in the past six years (five in Scotland) then it is almost certainly "STATUTE BARRED".
This does not mean that the debt simply goes away but it cannot be legaly enforced.
Check this link out for full details --http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/
Give them a ring they are really helpful and not judgemental.
Ethel --- It is true-- who is to say he didn't inform them six years ago.
They CANNOT prove he did not send a letter and he does NOT need to prove he did .
Ethel --- It is true-- who is to say he didn't inform them six years ago.
They CANNOT prove he did not send a letter and he does NOT need to prove he did .