>Monarchy should have more say.
A monarch is there by "luck" of birth, so what makes them any more suitable to run the country than you or me.
While we have had "good" monarchs in the past, we have had some awful ones.
We have had monarchs who could not speak English, or lived abroad most of their lives, or who ignored their responsibilities and spent their life "having fun".
Some people might argue (and many do) that in fact the current Queen has too much involvement in the way the country is run.
For example why should the PM have to go to her to ask to dissolve parliament (call an election)?
France and the US (as examples) run quite happily with no royal family, and many countries, like Holland, have a royal family but they are not stuck on a pedastel like our lot and paid to have a life of extreme luxury.
Do you really think our current royal family set a good example?
3 out of 4 of the Queens children have divorced and one admits on TV that he had an affair while married.