Donate SIGN UP

Repo

Avatar Image
joesdaddy | 14:49 Mon 16th Nov 2009 | Law
2 Answers
When i was talking to my brother in law about his house being repossessed I asked him when he had to hand the keys to the bailiffs, he said they did not want the keys and preferred to break in .Has he got this wrong or is there a reason why they prefer this method I don't know whether it makes any difference but the house is empty cheers
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by joesdaddy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
This sounds a bit odd, you would think they would want the keys. After all they are repossessing the house on behalf of the mortgage company, I am not sue they would want the house broken into.

But I am not sure how they do it these days.
Clearly, they will break in if there is no one there when they go to repossess it if they have not been given the keys. But they will then raise a charge for the repair work to put right the damage they have caused breaking in, & that will be added to all the other charges that will be made. The total, together with the outstanding mortgage and interest, will the charged against the account & deducted from the sale price when the lender sells the house. If they then have any money left over it will be returned to your brother in law, but if there is a shortfall they will chase him for it as he has a legal liability to pay it. So it could be in his interest to reduce their costs by making sure they have the keys (& by being present to make sure they do use them & don't break in anyway!)

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Repo

Answer Question >>