ChatterBank0 min ago
Bank charges
I sent a letter to my bank asking for my bank charges back, over a year ago.
In that time I also requested my old bank statements though I have not yet sent those off.
I didn't realise that after 14 days you had the right to write again and so did not do so. I have now however just received a letter from my bank (the first one so far) declining to pay back my charges. The letter states that since the court case dated 25th Nov 2009 they do not have to pay the charges back, but obviously they must have received my letter way before this date.
Is there anything I can do to move this forward or just a write off?
In that time I also requested my old bank statements though I have not yet sent those off.
I didn't realise that after 14 days you had the right to write again and so did not do so. I have now however just received a letter from my bank (the first one so far) declining to pay back my charges. The letter states that since the court case dated 25th Nov 2009 they do not have to pay the charges back, but obviously they must have received my letter way before this date.
Is there anything I can do to move this forward or just a write off?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by emmakwall. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The matter has been decided by the courts and your only hope now is to pursue a claim under the Unfair Terms in Consumner Contracts Act, although I think this is unlikely to be successful as there will be too many spurious claims from fee charging firms so all claims may be dismissed. Once you knew the bank was charging £35 a pop I suggest that was the time to switch banks or rectify matters by making sure further charges weren't incurred.
The Supreme Court ruling of November '09 overturned the OFT challenge based on the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations. This effectively rules out an individual pursuing a claim under the same Regulations.
The OFT announced on 22nd December that they will not engage in any further legal action in regard of bank charges.
The OFT announced on 22nd December that they will not engage in any further legal action in regard of bank charges.
-- answer removed --
THIS IS THE REASON.....
Buenchico (Mon 20:19 04/Jan/10) Report This
The court wisely ruled that the OFT can't produce a valid legal challenge to bank charges. So the banks are fully within their rights to refuse to repay them.
The UK is one of the few countries in Europe to offer free banking to personal customers. If the banks had been forced to reduce their charges we would all have had to pay for the privilege of having a bank account. (In most other Western European countries it costs around £25 per month simply to have a bank account, even if you never overdraw on the account).
If the courts haved ruled that the OFT can't challenge bank charges then the chances of you successfully doing so are effectively nil.
Chris
Buenchico (Mon 20:19 04/Jan/10) Report This
The court wisely ruled that the OFT can't produce a valid legal challenge to bank charges. So the banks are fully within their rights to refuse to repay them.
The UK is one of the few countries in Europe to offer free banking to personal customers. If the banks had been forced to reduce their charges we would all have had to pay for the privilege of having a bank account. (In most other Western European countries it costs around £25 per month simply to have a bank account, even if you never overdraw on the account).
If the courts haved ruled that the OFT can't challenge bank charges then the chances of you successfully doing so are effectively nil.
Chris
-- answer removed --
Why do people think they have the right to help themselves to the bank's money when they have spent their own? What would happen if all unauthorised payments were refused? Your gas and electric would be cut off? The debt companies would be on your backs?
If you can't manage your money you shouldn't have a current account.
Spend your own money and not other peoples.
If you can't manage your money you shouldn't have a current account.
Spend your own money and not other peoples.
-- answer removed --
These banks are not charities. They are there to make money. Why should I pay extra for an account because other people can't budget? Yes, I've been caught out with these charges once or twice but it's my own fault for going into the red.
If you don't want to pay charges, keep in the black. Simples.
If you don't want to pay charges, keep in the black. Simples.
-- answer removed --
The argument is not about being charged it`s the amount they charge, and it has been proved that the most it costs banks is £4.50, not £35, and yes as you say, "you know the rules" it`s still too much
My wages get paid into my account every 4th friday, my money doesn`t hit my account til 5am, yet a DD on the same day gets taken out just after midnight and the bank won`t cover it, is that fair?
My wages get paid into my account every 4th friday, my money doesn`t hit my account til 5am, yet a DD on the same day gets taken out just after midnight and the bank won`t cover it, is that fair?
-- answer removed --