Technology2 mins ago
my policies to sort this country out
1) sort the laptop to underpriviledged families out (one per household and security on them so you can't go on websites such as facebook and youtube)
2) if foreingers comit a crime in the UK they'll be sent home or if criminals try and come into the UK they won't be allowed
3) If you get sentenced to prison, you do your full sentence, unless youre somehow proven inocent
4) somehow you'll be checked on to see if you're actually disabled ect so that you can't work and can claim benefits.
5) Advertising of alcohol will be banned and i'll keep the forcoming minimum price per unit
6) MPs won't be able to claim money back at all, their wages are high enough so that they should be able to pay for their own food ect.
that's all i can think up at the moment and will come back with more
feel free to comment
2) if foreingers comit a crime in the UK they'll be sent home or if criminals try and come into the UK they won't be allowed
3) If you get sentenced to prison, you do your full sentence, unless youre somehow proven inocent
4) somehow you'll be checked on to see if you're actually disabled ect so that you can't work and can claim benefits.
5) Advertising of alcohol will be banned and i'll keep the forcoming minimum price per unit
6) MPs won't be able to claim money back at all, their wages are high enough so that they should be able to pay for their own food ect.
that's all i can think up at the moment and will come back with more
feel free to comment
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mollykins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
i have another policy and a way to make money for the benefit of society.
when people have to use the police/fire/ambulance services through their own fault ie they're being anti social or ill because they are drunk and being a nusaince to society, or say did arson and are proven to do it, they should be charged. possibly for damage/ the cost of equipment used or the wages of the people .
But not people who call the services for a genuine accidental emergency, ie a heart attack or they've been burgled.
when people have to use the police/fire/ambulance services through their own fault ie they're being anti social or ill because they are drunk and being a nusaince to society, or say did arson and are proven to do it, they should be charged. possibly for damage/ the cost of equipment used or the wages of the people .
But not people who call the services for a genuine accidental emergency, ie a heart attack or they've been burgled.
do i sound like a tory then? i thought they were posh middle class people mainly?
according to my idiot of a geography teacher, i live in an upper class area. my dads a builder earning between 25 and 30k (i only know this because he said how much ema money i will get) and my mum, since i've been at school has had a few tempory, part time jobs. but because i live in a detatched house (which was cheap because it needed doing up and is in a rough area) i count as upper class, even though its in a not very posh area, (the road next to us is the start of a council estate)
according to my idiot of a geography teacher, i live in an upper class area. my dads a builder earning between 25 and 30k (i only know this because he said how much ema money i will get) and my mum, since i've been at school has had a few tempory, part time jobs. but because i live in a detatched house (which was cheap because it needed doing up and is in a rough area) i count as upper class, even though its in a not very posh area, (the road next to us is the start of a council estate)
I think that you should be commended for political views of any tyoe at 16 - it's needed more that you think.
I actually wouldn't have a huge issue with your views; but I also think that the thousands of out of work construction workers could be utilised to rebuild schools and hospitals, roads and infrastructure.
I'm not sure you should/could limit internet use,
also re the foreigners - would you limit this to first generation immigrants or do what they do in Germany whereby convicted people who are e.g. third generation Turkish people are sent to Turkley even though they and their parents were born in Germany and lived there all their lives?
I agree with your sentencing ideas, and would actually increase the tariff so that they would at least finish full term at today's levels, thus keeping the good behaviour carrott.
Alcohol - no issue there; also checks on anyone claiming benefits.
As to expenses - I disagree with that; I don't think anyone should be out of pocket for doing their job - politician or not - but so long as the expenses are fully vouched (provide receipts) and within guidelines I would not stop expenses. Remember that expenses also cover the employment of staff and travel.
Banning of certain groups is difficult if you believe in free speech by the way; it's the actions that you can legislate against rather than the message.
have you ever thought of joining a political party?
I actually wouldn't have a huge issue with your views; but I also think that the thousands of out of work construction workers could be utilised to rebuild schools and hospitals, roads and infrastructure.
I'm not sure you should/could limit internet use,
also re the foreigners - would you limit this to first generation immigrants or do what they do in Germany whereby convicted people who are e.g. third generation Turkish people are sent to Turkley even though they and their parents were born in Germany and lived there all their lives?
I agree with your sentencing ideas, and would actually increase the tariff so that they would at least finish full term at today's levels, thus keeping the good behaviour carrott.
Alcohol - no issue there; also checks on anyone claiming benefits.
As to expenses - I disagree with that; I don't think anyone should be out of pocket for doing their job - politician or not - but so long as the expenses are fully vouched (provide receipts) and within guidelines I would not stop expenses. Remember that expenses also cover the employment of staff and travel.
Banning of certain groups is difficult if you believe in free speech by the way; it's the actions that you can legislate against rather than the message.
have you ever thought of joining a political party?
That's the point of politics Mollykins - you cannot and should not change your views just because of the populist vote; having your mind changed by a real debate is a different story. You should be honest with yourself and those you'd ask to vote for you, in fact that's desperately missing in politics today.
