Donate SIGN UP

drink driving

Avatar Image
gina32 | 18:45 Sun 29th Aug 2010 | Law
16 Answers
if someone gets caught drink driving within the first 2 years of having a licence is the punishment more severe?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 16 of 16rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by gina32. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
No. The punishment would be the same from the courts but because the license hasn't been held for over two years you'll have to retake the driving test.

Also...finding affordable car insurance will be near on impossible.
Question Author
thanks for that, i knew about teh re-test, and no its not me, honestly!!!
Not quite correct, ummmm.

Driving with excess alcohol carries a mandatory disqualification. The “New Drivers’” regulations stipulate that a driver who accumulates six or more penalty points within two years of passing his first test has his full licence revoked, reverts to provisional status and has to take his test again.

However, these regulations do not apply to drivers who are disqualified. (Some might – quite rightly - think this strange as disqualification usually means a more serious offence has been committed, but there it is). No points are awarded for drink-driving (you cannot be disqualified and have points awarded) so the New Drivers’ regulations do not apply.

You are certainly correct about the insurance aspect.
Gosh...that is silly really.
Question Author
thank you
TBH i think whoever your asking for needs to grow up a little. to have a license and (i am not critising in any way, as i know myself the hard work and money involved in passing your test ) get caught drinking within the first two years?
Come on, you will all moan at my comment on this stupid driver your asking for but what if this idiot harmed your child? damaged your car and his/her insurance was void because they were drinking! Think of the serious ness involved they should ban you from ever having a license if it really doesnt mean much to u
And so begins the judgement and criticism that seems to be attracted to any question of this nature.

How many more "answers" will there be now? Thirty? Forty, pehaps?

I'll stand by !!!
The whole idea of the mandatory retest for less experienced drivers is really a bit nonsensical

why would you punish a speeding motorist of 18 months more than a speeding driver who's held a license for 3 years - the offence is the same and should attract the same penalty.

You might claim that it shows that when they passed they didn't show their true driving style or some argument like that - but I believe the same penalty would be attached to an insurance offence which is hardly a reflection on somebody's ability to drive.

In either case why not apply it to all drivers or do we think that a more experienced driver cannot change his spots so why bother?

Strikes me that the whole thing was cooked up by politicians looking for some positive press - Hmm new drivers act 1995 - that sounds like it might have been Michael Howard about the time Jeremy Paxman was beating him up on Newsnight
very true, new judge...you can almost hear the selfr rightious squrming in their seats with excitement at the chance to spout out their opinions and condemn people with a lecture for merely asking a question...

its very tedious to have to wade through it all too and get to some proper answers
New Judge - "No points are awarded for drink-driving (you cannot be disqualified and have points awarded)"

I am somewhat confused by your statement since the penalty for driving with excess alcohol includes obligatory endorsement of 3-11 penalty points and obligatory disqualification.
No it doesn't, ABerrant.

Section 5.1(a) of the Road Traffic Act covers DRIVING with excess alcohol and the penalties include a mandatory minimum 12 month disqualification (3 years if a second or subsequent offence within 10 years). Section 5.1(b) covers being IN CHARGE of a vehicle with excess alcohol and the penalties include a discretionary disqualification or the imposition of a minimum of 10 penalty points. Pages 124 and 126 of the Magistrates’ sentencing guidelines refer:

http://webarchive.nat...e_1_%202%20_3_web.pdf

If a ban is imposed (either mandatory or discretionary) no penalty points can be awarded for the same offence.

The idea of the New Drivers’ regulations, jake, is to deter new (particularly young) drivers from offending. Regardless of who introduced them they have proved very effective. Young drivers lose a lot of “street cred” if they revert to ‘L’ Plates and sometimes ask magistrates to disqualify them for a short period instead of awarding points which might take them to six or more. They also fit with the structured sentencing philosophy because, in the same way that more care should be taken in the snow, more care should be taken by inexperienced drivers. Offences committed in harsh conditions are likely to be sentenced more severely and new drivers driving beyond their capabilities can also expect harsher sentencing. The matter of revocation is not one for magistrates as licence revocation is done by the DVLA and there is no right of appeal or opportunity to put forward any mitigation.
I went to the sentencing guidelines before posting. What am I misreading from them?

P.124 Excess alcohol (drive/attempt to drive)

Triable only summarily:
Maximum: Level 5 fine and/or 6 months

Must endorse and disqualify for at least 12 months...
Quite right, AB - MUST disqualify. Page 126 (In Charge) – MAY disqualify.

With some minor exceptions, most driving offences carry an endorsement. Whether or not they attract a disqualification (mandatory or discretionary) or penalty points is a separate issue. Endorsements can be applied when no disqualification or penalty points are imposed.

For example, a driver may be convicted of speeding and no insurance (arising from one incident or "stop" by the police). He will be awarded a disqualification or penalty points for the most serious (No Insurance). His licence will be endorsed for that offence. He will receive no points or disqualification for the speeding offence, but his licence will also be endorsed for that offence.
I see my mistake - I read "endorse" as synonymous with "impose points".

Sorry for the confusion.
No probs, AB. Glad to help clear the confusion.
Question Author
donna, "they should ban you" "if it doesnt really mean that much to you", as i said the question wasnt about me.

1 to 16 of 16rss feed

Do you know the answer?

drink driving

Answer Question >>