Donate SIGN UP

Style of legal cases

Avatar Image
Segilla | 17:43 Fri 03rd Dec 2010 | Law
2 Answers
Am I right in thinking that in e.g., Smith v. Jones, Smith is the Plaintiff, Jones the Defendant - and has it always been so, back as far as 1757?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Segilla. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
My understanding is the same as yours. Plaintiff vs Defendant, I can't comment on the history.
The first named is the plaintiff, although in civil cases the term used now is 'claimant'.
When the new rules came into effect a few years ago, a barrister stood up in court at the start of a trial and said, "M'lud, I represent the plaintiff", to which the judge replied, "no you don't, you represent the claimant". It goes back a lot further than 1757 I think.

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Style of legal cases

Answer Question >>