Spam & Scams1 min ago
Perverts at the Mail?
Okay - last 'Daily Mail bashing post of the month...promise.
Have a look at this story:
http://www.dailymail....Love-performance.html
Now, am I being over-sensitive by pointing out that referring to Rihanna's outfit as "Tantalizing in tartan...Rihanna set pulses racing in a naughty school girl get up".
Seriously - how dodgy is that?
Turn it around for a moment - say if Robbie Williams released a track and appeared in the accompanying video dressed a boy scout, there would be an outcry if he were described as "Robbie was dressed as a sexy school boy..."
It's wrong, surely???
Have a look at this story:
http://www.dailymail....Love-performance.html
Now, am I being over-sensitive by pointing out that referring to Rihanna's outfit as "Tantalizing in tartan...Rihanna set pulses racing in a naughty school girl get up".
Seriously - how dodgy is that?
Turn it around for a moment - say if Robbie Williams released a track and appeared in the accompanying video dressed a boy scout, there would be an outcry if he were described as "Robbie was dressed as a sexy school boy..."
It's wrong, surely???
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.they probably bottled out of the headline 'Rihanna sets paedophiles' hearts aflutter', which is unlike them; but this celeb focus is the area in which the Mail's website differs sharply from the newspaper itself.
Schoolgirls wore tartan in my day, but perhaps it was only Scottish ones, I can't remember.
Schoolgirls wore tartan in my day, but perhaps it was only Scottish ones, I can't remember.
Is ot me, or can you see out of her nostrils in this puc?
http://i.dailymail.co...00578-154_634x315.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co...00578-154_634x315.jpg
And again without drunken fingers.
Can you see out of her nostrils in this pic?
http://i.dailymail.co...00578-154_634x315.jpg
Can you see out of her nostrils in this pic?
http://i.dailymail.co...00578-154_634x315.jpg
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
No not really wrong tbh, ' sexy' schoolgirls have always featured in the British 'culture' mainly since they tend to emulate the older fashioned girl's finishing school uniforms which would mean the girls fell into the post pubescent 16+ group. I can't see anyone getting turned on by a girl in a real school uniform, it's just a play on words ( since it doesn't look like a current school uniform at all) rather than an actual attempt to stir up latent paedophilia I think.
sp1814
You seem to have an unnatural obsession with paedophiles.
You also continually criticise the Mail, if you don't like it why do you read from it?
It is almost like taking the trouble to reach up to read a top-shelf magazine, and then posting on here how disgusting you found it.
Notice you never made any remarks about the picture the Mail printed regarding the 'Pride London Gay Festival'.
http://i.dailymail.co...0044D-522_468x703.jpg
You seem to have an unnatural obsession with paedophiles.
You also continually criticise the Mail, if you don't like it why do you read from it?
It is almost like taking the trouble to reach up to read a top-shelf magazine, and then posting on here how disgusting you found it.
Notice you never made any remarks about the picture the Mail printed regarding the 'Pride London Gay Festival'.
http://i.dailymail.co...0044D-522_468x703.jpg
I would not wish to attempt to answer on behalf od sp1814, but I have failed to notice an 'obsession' with paedophiles - can you offer any eveidence to back up that assertion AOG?
Similarly, I fail to see a link between the picture you have posted, and the point SP is making - can you expland please? Thank you.
Similarly, I fail to see a link between the picture you have posted, and the point SP is making - can you expland please? Thank you.
'twas I who made the remark about paedophiles, andy; and I was thinking what the Mail's response might be if a paedophile was found with photos of bogus schoolgirls.
In truth, the answer is probably 'not much', since 'naughty schoolgirls' seem to be part of the lexicon of many British males, for reasons that elude me but probably aren't really paedophiliac.
My comment was made on a personal basis, not in my capacity as representative of the international communist conspiracy.
In truth, the answer is probably 'not much', since 'naughty schoolgirls' seem to be part of the lexicon of many British males, for reasons that elude me but probably aren't really paedophiliac.
My comment was made on a personal basis, not in my capacity as representative of the international communist conspiracy.