I'm finding it very upsetting.
Get evicted...or take a house out of the area,and have to spend an extra £350per month to get to job. The way its portrayed,they are under a lot of pressure to make on the spot desicions.
For a lot of people there is a problem of an earnings cap too- employers will only pay the going rate and not what people need. It's a harsh world for many, whether working or on benefits.
However, to be a bit more constructive, why do these people keep churning out children when they are in such dire straits? I've only been watching for five minutes. Customer 1 - five children (earning £150pw, drawing £800pw) ; customer 2 - seven children; customer 3 - nine children; customer 4 (studying) three children.
All these people are receiving two or three times the basic state pension.
Its difficult isn't it? I really do get the argument that its not fair for taxpayers who can't afford to rent somewhere with enough rooms to subsidise people on benefits so they can have bigger accommodation that the non benefit claimer has.....but if there is nowhere to downsize to....
and I am really sorry but I can't agree with an argument i heard this morning which was "I need a spare room for when my grandchildren stay over"
People occupying social housing should only have the bedrooms they need, keeping a 'spare' room is selfish. Lots of people who own their homes don't have 'spare' rooms.
agree with sherrardk and new judge, 1 bedroom for 1 person. my heart goes out to that single mum who is doing voluntary work and they are going to move her out of her house into another house in another strange town.....uk is in bits !!!
still no mention of the flood gates open upo to romanian scroungers .