Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Famous Rich And "homeless", Willie Thorne What A Wimp!
31 Answers
2 nights in a hotel, part time homeless, at least the others did it!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I always find these programmes offensive.
The notion that spending time pretending to be homeless gives anyone an insight into what it is like is patronising towards homeless people.
The grinding endless futility of homelessness is cumulative - you don't experience it after a few days, or even a few weeks.
I would respect anyone saying they experienced street living if they did it for a year - nothing less.
Spending a few nights being watched by a camera and saying you know what it is like to be homeless is like closing your eyes for an hour and then saying you understand how it feels to be blind.
The notion that spending time pretending to be homeless gives anyone an insight into what it is like is patronising towards homeless people.
The grinding endless futility of homelessness is cumulative - you don't experience it after a few days, or even a few weeks.
I would respect anyone saying they experienced street living if they did it for a year - nothing less.
Spending a few nights being watched by a camera and saying you know what it is like to be homeless is like closing your eyes for an hour and then saying you understand how it feels to be blind.
Margo Tester - //Andy-Hughes - the programme was in aid of Sport Relief. The aim being to bring attention of the general public the plight of homeless people, so not an altogether futile exercise. Just my opinion of course. //
I fail to see what attention is brought to the plight of homeless people by having a few 'celebrities' play at it for a few days.
What next, shall we have a few 'celebrities' tootling about in wheelchairs and saying they know how a paraplegic feels?
The whole nonsense is that they know it's not real, and there is a finite time involved - in reality, for people who are actually homeless, time stretches on for years into the future with no hope of a return to a celebrity lifestyle when the cameras turn off.
Or indeed any sort of 'lifestyle' at all!!
I fail to see what attention is brought to the plight of homeless people by having a few 'celebrities' play at it for a few days.
What next, shall we have a few 'celebrities' tootling about in wheelchairs and saying they know how a paraplegic feels?
The whole nonsense is that they know it's not real, and there is a finite time involved - in reality, for people who are actually homeless, time stretches on for years into the future with no hope of a return to a celebrity lifestyle when the cameras turn off.
Or indeed any sort of 'lifestyle' at all!!
Mamya - //There's a large number of projects being undertaken in aid of Sports Relief both by celebrities and very special members of the public too - it was inevitable that some (this one in particular) would fall rather flat in the public eye. //
I don't think there is anything inevitable about it - except that no-one told the wonks in the production office that this is a patronising ill-thought-out insulting way to highlight an issue which is visible to anyone who walks down the street of any town in this country.
I don't think there is anything inevitable about it - except that no-one told the wonks in the production office that this is a patronising ill-thought-out insulting way to highlight an issue which is visible to anyone who walks down the street of any town in this country.
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - //Mamyalynne is quite right. If Joe public see some Z List celeb enduring the horrors of homelessness and they tell us how awful it is, job done. //
I think you flatter the viewing public with an ability to make the connection between playing at being homeless, and actually being homeless.
I think the ability to see that connection is probably absent in most people's minds - hence the futility of the exercise, apart from allowing few eight-figure income numpties to salve their consciences and their profiles simultaneously in this whole tawdry exercise.
I think you flatter the viewing public with an ability to make the connection between playing at being homeless, and actually being homeless.
I think the ability to see that connection is probably absent in most people's minds - hence the futility of the exercise, apart from allowing few eight-figure income numpties to salve their consciences and their profiles simultaneously in this whole tawdry exercise.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.